Yes, that was my thought. Actually all can be private but read_raw_bti.
Wdyt? Is there a way to keep the class private other than just not adding
it to init?


On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Alexandre Gramfort <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In mne/fiff/bti/raw.py:
>
> > +    info['dtype'] = DTYPES[info['data_format']]
> > +    bps = info['dtype'].itemsize * info['total_chans']
> > +    info['bytes_per_slice'] = bps
> > +
> > +    return info
> > +
> > +
> > +def _read_data(fname, config_fname, start=None, stop=None, dtype='f8'):
> > +    """ Helper function: read Bti processed data file (PDF)
> > +
> > +    Parameters
> > +    ----------
> > +    fname
> > +    start : int | None
> > +        The number of the first time slice to read. If None, all data will
> > +        be read from the begninning.
>
> if it can remain private then leave it private. The more private methods
> we have the less to explain to users.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/pull/385/files#r2707255>.
>
>