I'd vote against the qt-components dependency, since qt-components is
obsolete anyway.


On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Robin Burchell <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In src/qml/MainScreen.qml:
>
> > @@ -67,6 +76,7 @@ Item {
> >              origin.x: mainScreen.height / 2
> >              origin.y: mainScreen.height / 2
> >              angle: desktop.isPortrait ? -90 : 0
> > +            Behavior on angle { NumberAnimation { duration: 300; easing.type: Easing.OutCubic } }
>
> the way I'd like this to be done is to use qt-components window, instead
> of an Item
>
> this also removes the need for the rotation hack (since qt-components
> already has an understanding of orientation), sensor handling, etc - plus
> we can ditch some unneeded code out of lipstick (orientation handling, and
> status bar which is broken anyway)
>
> think you can look into that?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/nemomobile/lipstick-colorful-home/pull/9/files#r3098357>.
>
>