Yes sure. Does 'ga_pso_x' work?

Sorry about the cfg dependency. Should I fix them and make another request?


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Jason Ansel <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In opentuner/search/bandittechniques.py:
>
> > @@ -241,10 +241,16 @@ def get_seed(self):
> >          patternsearch.PatternSearch(),
> >        ], name = "AUCBanditMetaTechniqueC"))
> >  register(AUCBanditMetaTechnique([
> > -        differentialevolution.DifferentialEvolution(name='DE'),
> > -        evolutionarytechniques.UniformGreedyMutation(name='GA-OX'),
> > -        pso.PSO(name='PSO-OX'),
> > -        PureRandom(name='random')
> > +        PSO(crossover = 'OX3'),
> > +        PSO(crossover = 'OX1'),
> > +        PSO(crossover = 'CX'),
> > +        PSO(crossover = 'PMX'),
> > +        PSO(crossover = 'PX'),
> > +        evolutionarytechniques.GA(crossover = 'OX3', mutation_rate=0.01),
> > +        evolutionarytechniques.GA(crossover = 'OX1', mutation_rate=0.01),
> > +        evolutionarytechniques.GA(crossover = 'CX', mutation_rate=0.01),
> > +        evolutionarytechniques.GA(crossover = 'PX', mutation_rate=0.01),
> > +        evolutionarytechniques.GA(crossover = 'PMX', mutation_rate=0.01)
> >        ], name = "bandit"))
>
> Can we give this a more descriptive name than "bandit"?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/jansel/opentuner/pull/4/files#r6810304>
> .
>