CPUFREQ: Nightmare GOV updates/Reverts by Alucard + CPU utilization
Cleaning nightmare gov.
sched: Make default_scale_freq_power() static

As default_scale_{freq,smt}_power() and update_rt_power() are
used in kernel/sched/fair.c only, annotate them as static
functions.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5135A7AF.8010900@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
sched: Spelling fix

Signed-off-by: Andrei Epure <epure.andrei@gmail.com>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1362996200-2674-1-git-send-email-epure.andrei@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
sched: Fix variable name misnomer, add comments

The min_vruntime variable actually stores the maximum value.
The added comment was taken from place_entity function.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Epure <epure.andrei@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1363115544-1964-1-git-send-email-epure.andrei@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
time: RCU permitted to stop idle entry via softirq

The can_stop_idle_tick() function complains if a softirq vector is
raised too late in the idle-entry process, presumably in order to
prevent dangling softirq invocations from being delayed across the
full idle period, which might be indefinitely long -- and if softirq
was asserted any later than the call to this function, such a delay
might well happen.

However, RCU needs to be able to use softirq to stop idle entry in
order to be able to drain RCU callbacks from the current CPU, which in
turn enables faster entry into dyntick-idle mode, which in turn reduces
power consumption.  Because RCU takes this action at a well-defined
point in the idle-entry path, it is safe for RCU to take this approach.

This commit therefore silences the error message that is sometimes
produced when the going-idle CPU suddenly finds that it has an RCU_SOFTIRQ
to process.  The error message will continue to be issued for other
softirq vectors.

Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
nohz: Fix one jiffy count too far in idle cputime

When we stop the tick in idle, we save the current jiffies value
in ts->idle_jiffies. This snapshot is substracted from the later
value of jiffies when the tick is restarted and the resulting
delta is accounted as idle cputime. This is how we handle the
idle cputime accounting without the tick.

But sometimes we need to schedule the next tick to some time in
the future instead of completely stopping it. In this case, a
tick may happen before we restart the periodic behaviour and
from that tick we account one jiffy to idle cputime as usual but
we also increment the ts->idle_jiffies snapshot by one so that
when we compute the delta to account, we substract the one jiffy
we just accounted.

To prepare for stopping the tick outside idle, we introduced a
check that prevents from fixing up that ts->idle_jiffies if we
are not running the idle task. But we use idle_cpu() for that
and this is a problem if we run the tick while another CPU
remotely enqueues a ttwu to our runqueue:

CPU 0:                            CPU 1:

tick_sched_timer() {              ttwu_queue_remote()
       if (idle_cpu(CPU 0))
           ts->idle_jiffies++;
}

Here, idle_cpu() notes that &rq->wake_list is not empty and
hence won't consider the CPU as idle. As a result,
ts->idle_jiffies won't be incremented. But this is wrong because
we actually account the current jiffy to idle cputime. And that
jiffy won't get substracted from the nohz time delta. So in the
end, this jiffy is accounted twice.

Fix this by changing idle_cpu(smp_processor_id()) with
is_idle_task(current). This way the jiffy is substracted
correctly even if a ttwu operation is enqueued on the CPU.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.5+
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1349308004-3482-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
tick: Consolidate timekeeping handling code

Unify the duplicated timekeeping handling code of low and high res tick
sched handlers.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
tick: Consolidate tick handling for high and low res handlers

Besides unifying code, this also adds the idle check before
processing idle accounting specifics on the low res handler.
This way we also generalize this part of the nohz code for
!CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS to prepare for the adaptive tickless
features.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
tick: Conditionally build nohz specific code in tick handler

This optimize a bit the high res tick sched handler.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
timers, sched: Correct the comments for tick_sched_timer()

In the comments of function tick_sched_timer(), the sentence
"timer->base->cpu_base->lock held" is not right.

In function __run_hrtimer(), before call timer->function(),
the cpu_base->lock has been unlocked.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Cc: fei.li@intel.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1351098455.15558.1421.camel@cliu38-desktop-build
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Massive Update to kernel/time/ from 3.9.y, more will be ported! all changes from: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commits/master/kernel/time/timekeeping.c?page=1 + page 2 + 3
time: Move update_vsyscall definitions to timekeeper_internal.h

Since users will need to include timekeeper_internal.h, move
update_vsyscall definitions to timekeeper_internal.h.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
timers: Provide generic Kconfig switches

We really don't want all the arch code defining stuff
over and over.

[ anna-maria: Added missing GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE switch ]

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@glx-um.de>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337529587.3208.2.camel@dionysos
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
timers: Fixup the Kconfig consolidation fallout

Sigh, I missed to check which architecture Kconfig files actually
include the core Kconfig file. There are a few which did not. So we
broke them.

Instead of adding the includes to those, we are better off to move the
include to init/Kconfig like we did already with irqs and others.

This does not change anything for the architectures using the old
style periodic timer mode. It just solves the build wreckage there.

For those architectures which use the clock events infrastructure it
moves the include of the core Kconfig file to "General setup" which is
a way more logical place than having it at random locations specified
by the architecture specific Kconfigs.

Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@glx-um.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
time: Convert CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL to CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD

To help migrate archtectures over to the new update_vsyscall method,
redfine CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL as CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Set GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD for ARM branch.
time: Introduce new GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL

Now that we moved everyone over to GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD,
introduce the new declaration and config option for the new
update_vsyscall method.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
time: Only do nanosecond rounding on GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD systems

We only do rounding to the next nanosecond so we don't see minor
1ns inconsistencies in the vsyscall implementations. Since we're
changing the vsyscall implementations to avoid this, conditionalize
the rounding only to the GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD architectures.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
timekeeping: Cast raw_interval to u64 to avoid shift overflow

We fixed a bunch of integer overflows in timekeeping code during the 3.6
cycle.  I did an audit based on that and found this potential overflow.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20121009071823.GA19159@elgon.mountain
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org