ext4: ext4_split_extent should take care of extent zeroout

When ext4_split_extent_at() ends up doing zeroout & conversion to
initialized instead of split & conversion, ext4_split_extent() gets
confused and can wrongly mark the extent back as uninitialized
resulting in end IO code getting confused from large unwritten extents
and may result in data loss.

The example of problematic behavior is:
			    lblk len              lblk len
  ext4_split_extent() (ex=[1000,30,uninit], map=[1010,10])
    ext4_split_extent_at() (split [1000,30,uninit] at 1020)
      ext4_ext_insert_extent() -> ENOSPC
      ext4_ext_zeroout()
	 -> extent [1000,30] is now initialized
    ext4_split_extent_at() (split [1000,30,init] at 1010,
			     MARK_UNINIT1 | MARK_UNINIT2)
      -> extent is split and parts marked as uninitialized

Fix the problem by rechecking extent type after the first
ext4_split_extent_at() returns. None of split_flags can not be applied
to initialized extent so this patch also add BUG_ON to prevent similar
issues in future.

TESTCASE: https://github.com/dmonakhov/xfstests/commit/b8a55eb5ce28c6ff29e620ab090902fcd5833597

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents

Derived from Jan's patch:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/36470

Merging of uninitialized extents creates all sorts of interesting race
possibilities when writeback / DIO races with fallocate. Thus
ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio() has to deal with a case where
extent to be converted needs to be split out first. That isn't nice
for two reasons:

1) It may need allocation of extent tree block so ENOSPC is possible.
2) It complicates end_io handling code

So we disable merging of uninitialized extents which allows us to simplify
the code. Extents will get merged after they are converted to initialized
ones.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
ext4: add warning to ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio

Splitting extents inside endio is a bad thing, but unfortunately it is
still possible.  In fact we are pretty close to the moment when all
related issues will be fixed.  Let's warn developer if it still the
case.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
ext4: remove unnecessary wait for extent conversion in ext4_fallocate()

Now that we don't merge uninitialized extents anymore,
ext4_fallocate() is free to operate on the inode while there are still
some extent conversions pending - it won't disturb them in any way.

Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4: invalidate extent status tree during extent migration

mext_replace_branches() will change inode's extents layout so
we have to drop corresponding cache.

TESTCASE:  301'th xfstest was not yet accepted to official xfstest's branch
and can be found here: https://github.com/dmonakhov/xfstests/commit/7b7efeee30a41109201e2040034e71db9b66ddc0

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
ext4: avoid a potential overflow in ext4_es_can_be_merged()

Check the length of an extent to avoid a potential overflow in
ext4_es_can_be_merged().

Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
ext4: add self-testing infrastructure to do a sanity check

This commit adds a self-testing infrastructure like extent tree does to
do a sanity check for extent status tree.  After status tree is as a
extent cache, we'd better to make sure that it caches right result.

After applied this commit, we will get a lot of messages when we run
xfstests as below.

...
kernel: ES len assertation failed for inode: 230 retval 1 != map->m_len
3 in ext4_map_blocks (allocation)
...
kernel: ES cache assertation failed for inode: 230 es_cached ex
[974/2/4781/20] != found ex [974/1/4781/1000]
...
kernel: ES insert assertation failed for inode: 635 ex_status
[0/45/21388/w] != es_status [44/1/21432/u]
...

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4: fix wrong m_len value after unwritten extent conversion

The ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents() function was assuming the
return value of ext4_ext_map_blocks() is equal to map->m_len.  This
incorrect assumption was harmless until we started use status tree as
a extent cache because we need to update status tree according to
'm_len' value.

Meanwhile this commit marks EXT4_MAP_MAPPED flag after unwritten extent
conversion.  It shouldn't cause a bug because we update status tree
according to checking EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag.  But it should be fixed.

After applied this commit, the following error message from self-testing
infrastructure disappears.

    ...
    kernel: ES len assertation failed for inode: 230 retval 1 !=
    map->m_len 3 in ext4_map_blocks (allocation)
    ...

Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
ext4: update extent status tree after an extent is zeroed out

When we try to split an extent, this extent could be zeroed out and mark
as initialized.  But we don't know this in ext4_map_blocks because it
only returns a length of allocated extent.  Meanwhile we will mark this
extent as uninitialized because we only check m_flags.

This commit update extent status tree when we try to split an unwritten
extent.  We don't need to worry about the status of this extent because
we always mark it as initialized.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
ext4: fix the wrong number of the allocated blocks in ext4_split_extent()

This commit fixes a wrong return value of the number of the allocated
blocks in ext4_split_extent.  When the length of blocks we want to
allocate is greater than the length of the current extent, we return a
wrong number.  Let's see what happens in the following case when we
call ext4_split_extent().

  map: [48, 72]
  ex:  [32, 64, u]

'ex' will be split into two parts:
  ex1: [32, 47, u]
  ex2: [48, 64, w]

'map->m_len' is returned from this function, and the value is 24.  But
the real length is 16.  So it should be fixed.

Meanwhile in this commit we use right length of the allocated blocks
when get_reserved_cluster_alloc in ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents
is called.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
ext4: fix WARN_ON from ext4_releasepage()

ext4_releasepage() warns when it is passed a page with PageChecked set.
However this can correctly happen when invalidate_inode_pages2_range()
invalidates pages - and we should fail the release in that case. Since
the page was dirty anyway, it won't be discarded and no harm has
happened but it's good to be safe. Also remove bogus page_has_buffers()
check - we are guaranteed page has buffers in this function.

Reported-by: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
ext4: remove unused variable in ext4_free_blocks()

Remove unused variable 'freed' in ext4_free_blocks().

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4: do not use yield()

Using yield() is strongly discouraged (see sched/core.c) especially
since we can just use cond_resched().

Replace all use of yield() with cond_resched().

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4: update reserved space after the 'correction'

Currently in ext4_ext_map_blocks() in delayed allocation writeback
we would update the reservation and after that check whether we claimed
cluster outside of the range of the allocation and if so, we'll give the
block back to the reservation pool.

However this also means that if the number of reserved data block
dropped to zero before the correction, we would release all the metadata
reservation as well, however we might still need it because the we're
not done with the delayed allocation and there might be more blocks to
come. This will result in error messages such as:

EXT4-fs warning (device sdb): ext4_da_update_reserve_space:361: ino 12,
allocated 1 with only 0 reserved metadata blocks (releasing 1 blocks
with reserved 1 data blocks)

This will only happen on bigalloc file system and it can be easily
reproduced using fiemap-tester from xfstests like this:

./src/fiemap-tester -m DHDHDHDHD -S -p0 /mnt/test/file

Or using xfstests such as 225.

Fix this by doing the correction first and updating the reservation
after that so that we do not accidentally decrease
i_reserved_data_blocks to zero.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4: reserve metadata block for every delayed write

Currently we only reserve space (data+metadata) in delayed allocation if
we're allocating from new cluster (which is always in non-bigalloc file
system) which is ok for data blocks, because we reserve the whole cluster.

However we have to reserve metadata for every delayed block we're going
to write because every block could potentially require metedata block
when we need to grow the extent tree.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
jbd2: fix use after free in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()

jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() didn't get a reference to journal_head it
was working with. This is OK in most of the cases since the journal head
should be attached to a transaction but in rare occasions when we are
journalling data, __ext4_journalled_writepage() can race with
jbd2_journal_invalidatepage() stripping buffers from a page and thus
journal head can be freed under hands of jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata().

Fix the problem by getting own journal head reference in
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() (and also in jbd2_journal_set_triggers()
which can possibly have the same issue).

Reported-by: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
ext4: use atomic64_t for the per-flexbg free_clusters count

A user who was using a 8TB+ file system and with a very large flexbg
size (> 65536) could cause the atomic_t used in the struct flex_groups
to overflow.  This was detected by PaX security patchset:

http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3289&p=12551#p12551

This bug was introduced in commit 9f24e4208f7e, so it's been around
since 2.6.30.  :-(

Fix this by using an atomic64_t for struct orlav_stats's
free_clusters.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
ext4: use s_extent_max_zeroout_kb value as number of kb

Currently when converting extent to initialized, we have to decide
whether to zeroout part/all of the uninitialized extent in order to
avoid extent tree growing rapidly.

The decision is made by comparing the size of the extent with the
configurable value s_extent_max_zeroout_kb which is in kibibytes units.

However when converting it to number of blocks we currently use it as it
was in bytes. This is obviously bug and it will result in ext4 _never_
zeroout extents, but rather always split and convert parts to
initialized while leaving the rest uninitialized in default setting.

Fix this by using s_extent_max_zeroout_kb as kibibytes.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org