no, you did. I was just wondering about the option. Thanks. I'm merging the
pull request.


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Michael Betancourt <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In src/docs/stan-reference/commands.tex:
>
> > @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ \section{Command-Line Options}\label{stan-command-line-options.section}
> >  %
> >      \hiercmdarg{\indentarrow\indentarrow}{algorithm}{$$list element$$}
> >        {Sampling algorithm}
> > -      {Valid values: hmc, rwm}
>
> It was, but since it just exited without calling any code I removed it
> from the valid arguments. Did I not update the documentation accordingly?
> … <#1413c2c71e2dd8a3_>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Lee <notifications@github.com>wrote:
> In src/docs/stan-reference/commands.tex: > @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@
> \section{Command-Line Options}\label{stan-command-line-options.section} > %
> > \hiercmdarg{\indentarrow\indentarrow}{algorithm}{$$list element$$} >
> {Sampling algorithm} > - {Valid values: hmc, rwm} @betanalpha<https://github.com/betanalpha><
> https://github.com/betanalpha>, was rwm a valid option before? — Reply to
> this email directly or view it on GitHub<
> https://github.com/stan-dev/stan/pull/215/files#r6489788> .
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/stan-dev/stan/pull/215/files#r6490713>
> .
>