Cope with heap_fetch failure while locking an update chain

The reason for the fetch failure is that the tuple was removed because
it was dead; so the failure is innocuous and can be ignored.  Moreover,
there's no need for further work and we can return success to the caller
immediately.  EvalPlanQualFetch is doing something very similar to this
already.

Report and test case from Andres Freund in
20131124000203.GA4403@alap2.anarazel.de
Don't try to set InvalidXid as page pruning hint

If a transaction updates/deletes a tuple just before aborting, and a
concurrent transaction tries to prune the page concurrently, the pruner
may see HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum return HEAPTUPLE_DELETE_IN_PROGRESS,
but a later call to HeapTupleGetUpdateXid() return InvalidXid.  This
would cause an assertion failure in development builds, but would be
otherwise Mostly Harmless.

Fix by checking whether the updater Xid is valid before trying to apply
it as page prune point.

Reported by Andres in 20131124000203.GA4403@alap2.anarazel.de
Compare Xmin to previous Xmax when locking an update chain

Not doing so causes us to traverse an update chain that has been broken
by concurrent page pruning.  All other code that traverses update chains
uses this check as one of the cases in which to stop iterating, so
replicate it here too.  Failure to do so leads to erroneous CLOG,
subtrans or multixact lookups.

Per discussion following the bug report by J Smith in
CADFUPgc5bmtv-yg9znxV-vcfkb+JPRqs7m2OesQXaM_4Z1JpdQ@mail.gmail.com
as diagnosed by Andres Freund.
Use a more granular approach to follow update chains

Instead of simply checking the KEYS_UPDATED bit, we need to check
whether each lock held on the future version of the tuple conflicts with
the lock we're trying to acquire.

Per bug report #8434 by Tomonari Katsumata