I believe because I don't have an XM.Vendor yet. Is that right thinking on
my part?


On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:01 PM, John Rogelstad <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In enyo-client/application/source/models/vendor.js:
>
> > +    @extends XM.Info
> > +  */
> > +  XM.VendorType = XM.Document.extend(/** @scope XM.VendorType.prototype */{
> > +
> > +    recordType: 'XM.VendorType',
> > +
> > +    documentKey: "code"
> > +
> > +  });
> > +
> > +  /**
> > +    @class
> > +
> > +    @extends XM.Info
> > +  */
> > +  XM.VendorRelation = XM.Document.extend(/** @scope XM.VendorRelation.prototype */{
>
> How come this isn't extending from XM.Info?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/xtuple/xtuple/pull/653/files#r5514034>
> .
>