Remove linked failure from the runtime

The reasons for doing this are:

* The model on which linked failure is based is inherently complex
* The implementation is also very complex, and there are few remaining who
  fully understand the implementation
* There are existing race conditions in the core context switching function of
  the scheduler, and possibly others.
* It's unclear whether this model of linked failure maps well to a 1:1 threading
  model

Linked failure is often a desired aspect of tasks, but we would like to take a
much more conservative approach in re-implementing linked failure if at all.

Closes #8674
Closes #8318
Closes #8863
Cache a task's stderr logger

This is both useful for performance (otherwise logging is unbuffered), but also
useful for correctness. Because when a task is destroyed we can't block the task
waiting for the logger to close, loggers are opened with a 'CloseAsynchronously'
specification. This causes libuv do defer the call to close() until the next
turn of the event loop.

If you spin in a tight loop around printing, you never yield control back to the
libuv event loop, meaning that you simply enqueue a large number of close
requests but nothing is actually closed. This queue ends up never getting
closed, meaning that if you keep trying to create handles one will eventually
fail, which the runtime will attempt to print the failure, causing mass
destruction.

Caching will provide better performance as well as prevent creation of too many
handles.

Closes #10626
auto merge of #10603 : alexcrichton/rust/no-linked-failure, r=brson

The reasons for doing this are:

* The model on which linked failure is based is inherently complex
* The implementation is also very complex, and there are few remaining who
  fully understand the implementation
* There are existing race conditions in the core context switching function of
  the scheduler, and possibly others.
* It's unclear whether this model of linked failure maps well to a 1:1 threading
  model

Linked failure is often a desired aspect of tasks, but we would like to take a
much more conservative approach in re-implementing linked failure if at all.

Closes #8674
Closes #8318
Closes #8863
auto merge of #10635 : alexcrichton/rust/issue-10626, r=cmr

This is both useful for performance (otherwise logging is unbuffered), but also
useful for correctness. Because when a task is destroyed we can't block the task
waiting for the logger to close, loggers are opened with a 'CloseAsynchronously'
specification. This causes libuv do defer the call to close() until the next
turn of the event loop.

If you spin in a tight loop around printing, you never yield control back to the
libuv event loop, meaning that you simply enqueue a large number of close
requests but nothing is actually closed. This queue ends up never getting
closed, meaning that if you keep trying to create handles one will eventually
fail, which the runtime will attempt to print the failure, causing mass
destruction.

Caching will provide better performance as well as prevent creation of too many
handles.

Closes #10626