It's been a while, but I think these test are asserting that we get the 
same answer when we parse WCS 1.0.0 and 1.1.0.  Basically, assuring that 
the two implementations are working consistently.

Chris


On 2013-09-12 20:11, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
>
> In tests/Format/WCSDescribeCoverage/v1.html:
>
> > +        t.eq(res1_0_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.domain.spatialDomain.boundingBoxes[res1_0_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.nativeCRS].bottom,
> > +             res1_1_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.domain.spatialDomain.boundingBoxes[res1_1_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.nativeCRS].bottom,
> > +             "1.0.0 and 1.1.0 have same native bounding box bottom coordinate");
> > +        t.eq(res1_0_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.domain.spatialDomain.boundingBoxes[res1_0_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.nativeCRS].left,
> > +             res1_1_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.domain.spatialDomain.boundingBoxes[res1_1_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.nativeCRS].left,
> > +             "1.0.0 and 1.1.0 have same native bounding box left coordinate");
> > +        t.eq(res1_0_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.domain.spatialDomain.boundingBoxes[res1_0_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.nativeCRS].right,
> > +             res1_1_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.domain.spatialDomain.boundingBoxes[res1_1_0.coverageDescriptions.ro_dsm.nativeCRS].right,
> > +             "1.0.0 and 1.1.0 have same native bounding box right coordinate");
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    </script>
> > +</head>
> > +<body> </body>
> > +</html>
> > +EPSG:28992
>
> what's this doing here?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
> <https://github.com/openlayers/openlayers/pull/846/files#r6329677>.
>