You're right about all of the changes. I think this has been chaos month II.
On Mar 20, 2013 10:01 PM, "John Myles White" <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> In test/data.jl:
>
> > @@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ a4 = within(a2, :( d = a + b ))
> >  @assert isequal(a4["d"], a2["a"] + a2["b"])
> >  @assert isequal(a4["a"], a2["a"])
> >
> > -a4c = @transform(copy(a2), d => a + b )
> > -@assert isequal(a4c["d"], a4["d"])
>
> It seemed to be, but I didn't revert this after fixing all of the other
> bugs. (There were a lot that had crept in since I last ran our test suit
> because of general changes in Julia.)
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/HarlanH/DataFrames.jl/pull/213/files#r3463717>
> .
>