As per our discussion, I know that in theory this could be an article. But on this page we are at the unique resource identifier for this article, and therefore for SEO benefits we should only have that being the single ```<article>``` on the page (yes we are using schema.org to identify this) and not other secondary content. Having said that it may be safe going forward if it was scoped inside a ```<section>``` element. We had this same discussion a while back regarding trails at the bottom of articles and decided against it. Therefore, I feel this should follow suit.