Honestly, I haven't touched this in a long time -- no longer have personal
need for it and I haven't got any recent bug reports either. I appreciate
your help, though, and if you'd like to code up new features, I'm happy to
discuss or review or anything.

Threaded tests: this may be a good idea, what with many-core CPUs being the
standard today, and some cores not as equal as others. Perhaps binding
threads to CPU cores could be another option.
Adding unit tests could be yet another idea, although I'm not sure how to
achieve that in C. :)

The whole idea behind MBW was to be simple, compiled the same way
(compiler, optimization and such) as some code you'd run in production, and
provide some base comparison of hardware architectures without having a
synthetic "magical-and-no-one-really-knows-what-numbers-mean" benchmark.


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:40 PM, James Slocum <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In mbw.c:
>
> >          gettimeofday(&starttime, NULL);
> > -        for(t=0; t<array_bytes; t+=block_size) {
> > -            b=mempcpy(b, a, block_size);
> > +        for (t=array_bytes; t >= block_size; t-=block_size, aa+=block_size){
>
> Oh, yeah just aesthetics, all counters in one line.
> Great to hear about the new release! I am more then happy to help with any
> TODO items. like threaded tests etc...
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/raas/mbw/pull/1/files#r6811219>
> .
>