Only two unit tests require compilation... The feature test are handled
differently.
On Apr 25, 2013 7:26 AM, "usrbincc" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In test/index.html:
>
> > +<!DOCTYPE html>
> > +<meta charset="utf-8">
> > +<link rel="stylesheet" href="../node_modules/mocha/mocha.css">
> > +<script src="../node_modules/mocha/mocha.js"></script>
> > +<script src="../node_modules/chai/chai.js"></script>
> > +<script src="../bin/traceur.js"></script>
> > +<script src="../src/bootstrap.js"></script>
> > +<script src="test-utils.js"></script>
> > +<script src="test-list.js"></script>
> > +<script>
> > +
> > +
> > +mocha.setup({ui: 'tdd'});
> > +
> > +</script>
> > +<script src="unit/codegeneration/PlaceholderParser.traceur.js" type="text/traceur"></script>
>
> Are all the feature tests going to have to be renamed to .traceur.js?
> That's starting to feel a little excessive, but I'm withholding judgment
> until we know the full extent of hacks (or lack thereof) needed to
> implement the testing functionality that we want.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/google/traceur-compiler/pull/279/files#r3958221>
> .
>