cpufreq: Retain only online cpus in managed_policy->cpus

cpufreq's handling of cpu online event can incorrectly initialize
managed_policy->cpus to include offline cpus. This causes cpufreq
governors to include offline cpus in their idle time computation, which
causes frequency to shoot up beyond normal levels (on systems where 2 or
more cpus need to be synchronized wrt frequency change).

This frequency shootup was not seen prior to commit 21111be8 which
changed idle time accounting for offline cpus. Prior to commit 21111be8,
idle time statistics for offline cpus would include their offline time
as well. Post commit 21111be8, offline time is not included in a cpu's
idle time statistics.

As a result, ondemand (or other cpufreq) governors would see unchanged
idle time for offline cpus, causing them to interpret those (offline)
cpus as 100% busy, which is wrong.

This patch fixes the issue by modifying cpufreq's hotplug handling to
retain only online cpus in managed_policy->cpus field. cpufreq governors
would then skip such offline cpus from idle time calculations.

Change-Id: Id2eba8c0ec3367609369b2e42a4e1386ff2e7ab5
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: Fix optimal_freq logic on ramp down

When ondemand governor decides to ramp down the frequency, the missing
check for frequency being lower than optimal_freq was causing frequency
to be ramped down to optimal_freq even if the frequency decided by ondemand
governor was higher.

Change-Id: I00f9ae4c61ccda4039f3338dee2c29b8cb790be4
Signed-off-by: Veena Sambasivan <veenas@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: Resolve CPUFREQ_NOTIFY issue

When the cpufreq_stat receives the frequency policy notification,
it checks if the frequency table and stats table are present for the cpu.
If both are present, it returns with -EBUSY error to the notification.
Due to this, none of the other registered modules receive this
notification.

If the stat table and sysfs nodes are already created, return 0 instead
of returning EBUSY error.

Change-Id: I1fd4a46e6a65edfc6253c4271288f10912ae2ad7
Signed-off-by: Archana Sathyakumar <asathyak@codeaurora.org>
Re-add 1566000Hz, 1620000Hz, 1674000Hz as frequency steps & fix undervolt on faster table.