Sure. Again, I am not quite sure how this got there. Judging by the date it is from older code of mine.

This was not the idea... The idea was to pull the code from git and thus make the changes we discussed and nothing more.

Sorry about that.


Arnd R. Strube
Software-Architect

Windhoff Software Services GmbH
Hofstraße 17, 48712 Gescher
Tel.: +49 (0) 25 42 / 95 59 44 | Fax: +49 (0) 25 42 / 95 59 20
a.strube@wind-soft.de | http://www.wind-soft.de



SAP BI – Aktuelle Themen in unserem Webcast
Kurz, prägnant und kostenlos | Gleich anmelden!

Standorte: Amberg | Berlin | Hamburg | Ingolstadt | Stuttgart | Wiesbaden | Wolfsburg

Geschäftsführung: Jürgen Kemp, Norbert Sundermann, Carsten Reinecke, Markus Brünen
Gesellschaftssitz: Gescher
Handelsregister: HRB 4486, 48651 Coesfeld



________________________________________
From: Bas Vodde [notifications@github.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 02:02
To: cpputest/cpputest
Cc: Arnd Strube
Subject: Re: [cpputest] withParameter() separate overload / override (#123)

In src/CppUTestExt/MockFunctionCall.cpp:

> @@ -25,6 +25,14 @@
>   * SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>   */
>
> + /** The method definition of MockIgnoredCall::instance() was moved
> +   * here from the header file, as the TI c2000 compiler does not
> +   * handle it correctly when the header is #included by multiple
> +   * sources. This should probably be fed back to JWG, because none
> +   * of the other instance() operations are defined in the header,
> +   * anyway. Arnd R. Strube, Mar 2013.
> +   */
> +


Please don't copy-paste comments :)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/cpputest/cpputest/pull/123/files#r4738501>.