Merge branch 'acpi-scan-next' into acpi-pm-next

* acpi-scan-next: (26 commits)
  ACPI: update ej_event interface to take acpi_device
  ACPI / scan: Add second pass to acpi_bus_trim()
  ACPI / scan: Change the implementation of acpi_bus_trim()
  ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim()
  ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister()
  ACPI: Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device
  ACPI: remove unused acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind
  ACPI / scan: Fix check of device_attach() return value.
  ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way
  ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member
  ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks
  ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c
  ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup
  ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type
  ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument
  ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag
  ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan()
  ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used
  ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
  ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add()
  ...
ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources

Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device
to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI
core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then
it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required
by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on.

Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices
depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they
should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0
state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices
the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices
depend on what power resources.

For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a
new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used
internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code
from kernel subsystems using ACPI.

For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be
resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into
D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in
the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage
such dependencies.  Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new
functions accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / scan: More straightforward preparation of ACPI device objects

Simplify the code preparing struct acpi_device objects for
registration by removing useless code, moving different pieces of
code into the functions they belong to and making a couple of int
functions always returning 0 void.

This also fixes a possible memory leak in ACPI device registration
error code path by making acpi_device_register() detach data from
device->handle if device_register() fails and prepares the scanning
code for special-casing ACPI power resources (next patch).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way

ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the
namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as
soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI
device nodes using them for power management).

For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation
of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device
hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects
actually used for power resource manipulation.  Accordingly, it
doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks
in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether
or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all).

Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are
initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that
also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them
with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine,
acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent
power resources from memory.  Make the ACPI namespace scanning code
in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and
registering objects that represent power resources.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI: Drop power resources driver

The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only
thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources
that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be
achieved in a different way.

Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add
acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all
registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones
that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI: Do not use device power states of power resources

ACPI power resource objects have struct acpi_device components, but
they are only used for registering those resources in the device
hierarchy.  In particular, power state information stored in them is
completely useless (amnong other things, because the power resources
"devices" are not power manageable), so there is no reason for the
power resources management code to keep it up to date.

Remove the code updating device power states of power resources from
drivers/acpi/power.c.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account

ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken
into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now.

Modify the power resources management code to preserve the
spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of
devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for
power resources used for wakeup).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of wakeup power resources into account

ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken
into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now.

Modify the power resources management code to preserve the
spec-compliant ordering of wakeup power resources.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / scan: Move power state initialization to a separate routine

To reduce indentation level and improve code readability, move the
initialization code related to device power states from
acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to a new routine,
acpi_bus_init_power_state().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / scan: Remove unnecessary initialization of local variables

The local variables in acpi_bus_get_power_flags() need not be
initialized upfront, so change the code accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists

The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two
different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power
resources that device power states depend on.  There is no reason
why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce
a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data
returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the
namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power
states power resources.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account

Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory
allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some
cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power
resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example.

Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code
so that power resource initialization errors are treated more
seriously.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI: Use system level attribute of wakeup power resources

The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest
system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be
"on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1).  On the other hand, wakeup power
resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to
signal wakeup.  Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from
sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes
of their wakeup power resources.

Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the
deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given
device can wake up the system from.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: Change the way power transitions to D3cold are carried out

During power transitions into D3cold from any shallower power states
we are supposed to transition the device into D3hot and remove power
from it afterward, but the current code in acpi_device_set_power()
doesn't work this way.

At the same time, though, we need to be careful enough to preserve
backwards compatibility for systems that don't distinguish between
D3hot and D3cold (e.g. designed before ACPI 4).

Modify acpi_device_set_power() so that it works in accordance with
the expectations in both cases.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: More visible function for retrieving device power states

The function used for retrieving ACPI device power states,
__acpi_bus_get_power(), is now static, because it is only used
internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c.  However, it will be used
outside of that file going forward, so rename it to
acpi_device_get_power(), in analogy with acpi_device_set_power(),
add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its header to acpi_bus.h.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: Common string representations of device power states

The function returning string representations of ACPI device power
states, state_string((), is now static, because it is only used
internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c.  However, it will be used outside
of that file going forward, so rename it to
acpi_power_state_string(), add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its
header to acpi_bus.h.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: Export power states of ACPI devices via sysfs

Make it possible to retrieve the current power state of an ACPI
device from user space via sysfs by adding a new attribute
power_state to the power subdirectory of the sysfs directory
associated with the struct acpi_device representing the device's
ACPI node.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: Move device power management functions to device_pm.c

Move ACPI device power management functions from drivers/acpi/bus.c
to drivers/acpi/device_pm.c.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: Consolidate suspend-specific and hibernate-specific code

Move some suspend-specific and hibernate-specific code from
acpi_sleep_init() into separate functions to get rid of explicit
#ifdefs in acpi_sleep_init().  Use pr_info() to start and pr_cont()
to continue printing the supported ACPI sleep states line.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PM: remove leading whitespace from #ifdef

It is there probably due to an accident, get rid of it so that the format
is consistent across the file.

Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>