Why... yes! Fix coming right up.

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Matthew Rocklin
<notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In logpy/unify.py:
>
> > @@ -77,15 +83,50 @@ def unify_dict(u, v, s):
> >              return False
> >      return s
> >
> > +def unify_slice(u, v, s):
> > +    s = unify(u.start, v.start, s)
> > +    if s is not False:
> > +        s = unify(u.stop, v.stop, s)
> > +    if s is not False:
> > +        s = unify(u.step, v.step, s)
> > +    #print 'unify_slice return', s
> > +    return s
> > +
>
> Could this be return unify_seq((u.start, u.stop, u.step), (v.start,
> v.stop, v.step), s) ?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/logpy/logpy/pull/21/files#r3580065>
> .
>