ceph: remove outdated frag information

If directory fragments change, fill_inode() inserts new frags into
the fragtree, but it does not remove outdated frags from the fragtree.
This patch fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
ceph: handle frag mismatch between readdir request and reply

If client has outdated directory fragments information, it may request
readdir an non-existent directory fragment. In this case, the MDS finds
an approximate directory fragment and sends its contents back to the
client. When receiving a reply with fragment that is different than the
requested one, the client need to reset the 'readdir offset'.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
ceph: drop unconnected inodes

Positve dentry and corresponding inode are always accompanied in MDS reply.
So no need to keep inode in the cache after dropping all its aliases.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
ceph: queue cap release in __ceph_remove_cap()

call __queue_cap_release() in __ceph_remove_cap(), this avoids
acquiring s_cap_lock twice.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
ceph: set caps count after composing cap reconnect message

It's possible that some caps get released while composing the cap
reconnect message.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
ceph: handle race between cap reconnect and cap release

When a cap get released while composing the cap reconnect message.
We should skip queuing the release message if the cap hasn't been
added to the cap reconnect message.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
ceph: Implement writev/pwritev for sync operation.

For writev/pwritev sync-operatoin, ceph only do the first iov.

I divided the write-sync-operation into two functions. One for
direct-write, other for none-direct-sync-write. This is because for
none-direct-sync-write we can merge iovs to one. But for direct-write,
we can't merge iovs.

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>