ARM: tegra: dvfs: Re-factor CPU alternative dvfs

Removed alternative frequencies table from dvfs structure, and
replaced it with table pointer to facilitate future support for
multiple alternative tables. Actually supported alternative dvfs
table (Tegra3 CPU cold zone table) is not changed.

Change-Id: Ia8c1d1f2dd450f0e48685e769ca925b8e6f5b57b
Signed-off-by: Alex Frid <afrid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/104882
Reviewed-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
ARM: tegra: dvfs: Alter CPU dvfs on EDP events

Extended EDP processing of cpu up/down events with calls to alter CPU
dvfs table. This is in addition to already supported changing of CPU
dvfs on EDP thermal event. For now, added calls do not actually alter
the table.

Change-Id: I1cbf2c54eeca8dea1e7b6f4c65d8dbaf563a980e
Signed-off-by: Alex Frid <afrid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/104883
Reviewed-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
ARM: tegra: dvfs: Separate Tegra3 single core dvfs table

On Tegra3 added mechanism to alter dvfs table between single and
multiple CPU cores. This mechanism is dormant since no single-core
table is available yet.

Change-Id: I63bd513bd5fd7347f64c88f46974cf7fac55c419
Signed-off-by: Alex Frid <afrid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/105508
Reviewed-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
ARM: tegra: dvfs: Fix error checking of voltage

Fix error checking of predicted voltage. Also get rid of
maybe-uninitialized warning when using 4.6 toolchain.

Bug 949219
Bug 999222

Change-Id: I47553aba5a93c91bdd93cbf75081d69f92aec4dd
Signed-off-by: Juha Tukkinen <jtukkinen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/108899
Reviewed-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
ARM: tegra: clock: Add locked version of round rate

Add locked version of round rate API to be used by tegra arch
specific layer.

Signed-off-by: Alex Frid <afrid@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit 457627966b91f2141439812869adc4acf9242471)

Change-Id: Id68d0bb952d1e7d9e650341872d1b06b0b2d3cea
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/100474
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Tested-by: Aleksandr Frid <afrid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Huan Hsu <yhsu@nvidia.com>
ARM: tegra: clock: Export clock minimum

Add clock minimum to debugfs.

Bug 917644

Change-Id: Ie088809829af2bdc81a969a034bf00847459f0ce
Signed-off-by: Antti P Miettinen <amiettinen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/101555
Reviewed-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Simone Willett <swillett@nvidia.com>
cpufreq: update lpj only if frequency has changed

During scaling up of cpu frequency, loops_per_jiffy
is updated upon invoking PRECHANGE notifier.
If setting to new frequency fails in cpufreq driver,
lpj is left at incorrect value.

Hence update lpj only if cpu frequency is changed,
i.e. upon invoking POSTCHANGE notifier.

Penalty would be that during time period between
changing cpu frequency & invocation of POSTCHANGE
notifier, udelay(x) may not gurantee minimal delay
of 'x' us for frequency scaling up operation.

Perhaps a better solution would be to define
CPUFREQ_ABORTCHANGE & handle accordingly, but then
it would be more intrusive (using ABORTCHANGE may
help drivers also; if any has registered notifier
and expect POST for a PRECHANGE, their needs can
be taken care using ABORT)

Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
cpufreq: Don't clip PM QoS requests to old policy limits

Clipping PM QoS requests to combined old policy limits that include
both PM QoS and user policy requests creates a circular dependency.
As a result new PM QoS maximum limit is rejected if it is above
previous PM QoS minimum limit even though the new PM QoS minimum
limit has been already lowered below new PM QoS maximum limit.

Instead clip PM QoS request to the old user policy limits only.

Change-Id: Ice0a53a699e0798f07f0e32d6b8a28586fe5db0c
Signed-off-by: Alex Frid <afrid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/102386
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Reviewed-by: Donghan Ryu <dryu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Antti Miettinen <amiettinen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Vikas Ramesh Kedigehalli <vikasr@nvidia.com>