Make REPLICATION privilege checks test current user not authenticated user.

The pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup() functions checked the privileges
of the initially-authenticated user rather than the current user, which is
wrong.  For example, a user-defined index function could successfully call
these functions when executed by ANALYZE within autovacuum.  This could
allow an attacker with valid but low-privilege database access to interfere
with creation of routine backups.  Reported and fixed by Noah Misch.

Security: CVE-2013-1901
Fix insecure parsing of server command-line switches.

An oversight in commit e710b65c1c56ca7b91f662c63d37ff2e72862a94 allowed
database names beginning with "-" to be treated as though they were secure
command-line switches; and this switch processing occurs before client
authentication, so that even an unprivileged remote attacker could exploit
the bug, needing only connectivity to the postmaster's port.  Assorted
exploits for this are possible, some requiring a valid database login,
some not.  The worst known problem is that the "-r" switch can be invoked
to redirect the process's stderr output, so that subsequent error messages
will be appended to any file the server can write.  This can for example be
used to corrupt the server's configuration files, so that it will fail when
next restarted.  Complete destruction of database tables is also possible.

Fix by keeping the database name extracted from a startup packet fully
separate from command-line switches, as had already been done with the
user name field.

The Postgres project thanks Mitsumasa Kondo for discovering this bug,
Kyotaro Horiguchi for drafting the fix, and Noah Misch for recognizing
the full extent of the danger.

Security: CVE-2013-1899
Update release notes for 9.2.4, 9.1.9, 9.0.13, 8.4.17.

Security: CVE-2013-1899, CVE-2013-1901
Stamp 9.1.9.
Minor robustness improvements for isolationtester.

Notice and complain about PQcancel() failures.  Also, don't dump core if
an error PGresult doesn't contain severity and message subfields, as it
might not if it was generated by libpq itself.  (We have a longstanding
TODO item to improve that, but in the meantime isolationtester had better
cope.)

I tripped across the latter item while investigating a trouble report on
buildfarm member spoonbill.  As for the former, there's no evidence that
PQcancel failure is actually involved in spoonbill's problem, but it still
seems like a bad idea to ignore an error return code.