introducing GIL to Scala reflection

On a serious note, I feel really uncomfortable about having to juggle
this slew of locks. Despite that I can't immediately find a deadlock,
I'm 100% sure there is one hiding in the shadows. Hence, I'm abandoning
all runtime reflection locks in favor of a single per-universe one.
optimizes Scala reflection GIL

First of all, GIL should only apply to runtime reflection, because noone
is going to run toolboxes in multiple threads: a) that's impossible, b/c
the compiler isn't thread safe, b) ToolBox api prevents that.

Secondly, the only things in symbols which require synchronization are:
1) info/validTo (completers aren't thread-safe),
2) rawInfo and its dependencies (it shares a mutable field with info)
3) non-trivial caches like in typeAsMemberOfLock

If you think about it, other things like sourceModule or associatedFile
don't need synchronization, because they are either set up when a symbol
is created or cloned or when it's completed.

We can say that symbols can be in four possible states: 1) being created,
2) created, but not yet initialized, 3) initializing, 4) initialized.
single thread. #2 and #4 don't need synchronization either, because the
only mutation symbols in runtime reflection can undergo is init. #3 is
dangerous and needs protection.
removes the assertion in missingHook

In the current synchronization scheme multiple threads can enter the
missingHook trying to materialize a package, which hasn't been created.

That's fine, because makeScalaPackage, which creates and enters package
symbols is synchronized and checks whether the creation is necessary
before commencing. Therefore even if makeScalaPackage is called multiple
times in rapid succession, the calls will be serialized and all calls
except the first one won't do anything.
runtime reflection: death from thousand threads

not anymore