"If it's not in the central maven repo,
      then its probably not important/stable/reliable/usable... So we
      can safely ignore it..."
      If knoplerfish is the exception to this pretty arrogant rule
      (which is accurate 90% of the time), then we either:
      A) need to ask the jboss nexus repo to proxy the knoplerfish
      repository too.
      or B) ask the knoplerfish guys to sync their repo to maven central
      It's relatively easy for a project to sync their repository to the
      maven central repository:
       
      http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html
        With kind regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
          Geoffrey De Smet
      
      Op 02-04-13 14:25, Cristiano Gavião schreef:
    
      In
drools-osgi/drools-osgi-enviroment-tests/drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-knoplerfish/pom.xml:
      > +<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> +    xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
> +    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
> +
> +    <parent>
> +        <groupId>org.drools</groupId>
> +        <artifactId>drools-osgi-enviroment-tests</artifactId>
> +        <version>6.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> +    </parent>
> +
> +    <artifactId>drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-knoplerfish</artifactId>
> +
> +    <repositories>
> +        <repository>
> +            <id>knopflerfish-releases</id>
> +            <url>http://www.knopflerfish.org/maven2</url>

      Well, Knoplerfish is not in the maven central repo. If Jboss
        wants to tests its Drools against it, this is the only way...
      —
        Reply to this email directly or view
          it on GitHub.