Improper procedure followed with rule 108.

Rule **108** states:

**108**. Each proposed rule-change shall be given a number for reference. The numbers shall begin with 301, and each rule-change proposed in the proper way shall receive the next successive integer, whether or not the proposal is adopted.

*If a rule is repealed and reenacted, it receives the number of the proposal to reenact it. If a rule is amended or transmuted, it receives the number of the proposal to amend or transmute it. If an amendment is amended or repealed, the entire rule of which it is a part receives the number of the proposal to amend or repeal the amendment.*

(emphasis added)

It doesn't seem perfectly clear to me, but I think that Rule 112 (for example) should actually be labeled 303 - the number of the rule that made it mutable, and that rule 303 should be struck. (This is also an issue for rule 302 and 305?)