Right, I'm saying is there any reason not to have the FAIL logic in the
builtin NIST one?


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Paul Kehrer <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In tests/utils.py:
>
> > @@ -174,3 +174,34 @@ def load_hash_vectors_from_file(filename):
> >      )
> >      with open(os.path.join(base, filename), "r") as vector_file:
> >          return load_hash_vectors(vector_file)
> > +
> > +
> > +def load_nist_gcm_vectors(vector_data):
>
> I'll have to look more closely, but if I recall the loader is almost
> identical to the NIST one with the exception of needing to be able to parse
> the FAIL lines. It's possible that we could just merge that into the NIST
> loader and not add a separate loader though.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/182/files#r7454556>
> .
>



-- 
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire)
"The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero
GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084