Futility pruning simplification

1/ eval margin and gains removed:
16bit are now free on TT entries, due to the removal of eval margin. may be useful
in the future :) gains removed: use instead by Value(128). search() and qsearch()
are now consistent in this regard.

2/ futility_margin()
linear formula instead of complex (log(depth), movecount) formula.

3/ unify pre & post futility pruning
pre futility pruning used depth < 7 plies, while post futility pruning used
depth < 4 plies. Now it's always depth < 7.

Tested with fixed number of games both at short TC:
ELO: 0.82 +-2.1 (95%) LOS: 77.3%
Total: 40000 W: 7939 L: 7845 D: 24216

And long TC
ELO: 0.59 +-2.0 (95%) LOS: 71.9%
Total: 40000 W: 6876 L: 6808 D: 26316

bench 7243575
Fix compile in debug mode

No functional change.
Fix printing of incorrect PV in some cases

As, Gary (that analyzed the bug) says:

SF does not print a PV when the original best move fails low,
we hit our time allowance, and stop the search.  The output from
the SF search is below.  It was failing low on Ne1 at depth 34.
Then, we get bestmove Qd3, but no PV change.

info depth 34 seldepth 45 score cp 38 upperbound nodes 483484489 nps 15464575 time 31264 multipv 1 pv f3e1 h5h4 e1d3 h4g3 f2g3 a6f6 f1f6 e7f6 d1a4 f6e7 a1f1 d8f8 a4b3 b7b6 b3c2 f7f6 c2a4 h3g5 b2b3 g5f7 a4c6 f7d6 h1g2 f6f5 e4f5 d6f5
info depth 34 seldepth 45 score cp 38 upperbound nodes 483484489 nps 15464575 time 31264 multipv 1 pv f3e1 h5h4 e1d3 h4g3 f2g3 a6f6 f1f6 e7f6 d1a4 f6e7 a1f1 d8f8 a4b3 b7b6 b3c2 f7f6 c2a4 h3g5 b2b3 g5f7 a4c6 f7d6 h1g2 f6f5 e4f5 d6f5
info depth 34 seldepth 47 score cp 30 upperbound nodes 2112334132 nps 17255517 time 122415 multipv 1 pv f3e1 h5h4 d1a4 a6f6 e1d3 d8f8 a4c2 h4g3 f2g3 f6f1 a1f1 h7g8 b2b3 f7f6 a3a4 b7b6
info depth 34 seldepth 47 score cp 30 upperbound nodes 2112334132 nps 17255517 time 122415 multipv 1 pv f3e1 h5h4 d1a4 a6f6 e1d3 d8f8 a4c2 h4g3 f2g3 f6f1 a1f1 h7g8 b2b3 f7f6 a3a4 b7b6
info nodes 18235667001 time 969824
bestmove e2d3 ponder c8d7

Looking at the code, if we hit Signals.stop, we return from id_loop
before printing any PV.  It is possible for us to have resorted the
RootMove list though, which will change the move that is actually
played.

No functional change.
Remove RedundantMajor

But compensate by reducing rook and queen
value by 53 = (160 / 3)

Material imbalances are affected as follows:

       Red. Major   Rook  Queen  Total
QRR      +160      -2*53    -53     +1
QR       +160        -53    -53    +54
RR       +160      -2*53      0    +54
R           0        -53      0    -53
Q           0          0    -53    -53

so that the imbalance changes by at most 54 + 53 = 107 units.
This corresponds to appromximately 3.5cp in the final evaluation.

Verified with fixed number 40000 games at both short
and long TC it does not regress.

Short TC 15+0.05
ELO: 1.93 +-2.1 (95%) LOS: 96.6%
Total: 40000 W: 7520 L: 7298 D: 25182

Long TC 60+0.05
ELO: -0.33 +-1.9 (95%) LOS: 36.5%
Total: 39663 W: 6067 L: 6105 D: 27491

bench: 6703846
Evaluate mobility of pinned pieces exactly

Previously some squares could be "incorrectly" awarded
to a pinned piece.

e.g. in 3k4/1q6/3b4/3Q4/8/5K2/B7/8 b - - 0 1 the black
bishop get 4 squares too many and the white queen gets 6.

Passed both short TC.
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 4871 W: 934 L: 817 D: 3120

And long TC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,6.00]
Total: 38968 W: 6113 L: 5837 D: 27018

bench: 9282549
Simplify squares_aligned()

Use newly introduced LineBB[]

No functional change.
Rename squares_aligned()

Rename to the shorter but still
clear aligned()

No functional change.
Remove opposed flag for doubled pawns

Actually, it is not used, as both arrays have the
same values. Some local tests in either direction
showed no improvement.

Also some minor corrections in the comments.

No functional change.
Reintroduce gains

This seems a die hard idea :-)

Passed both short TC
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 17485 W: 3307 L: 3156 D: 11022

And long TC
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,6.00]
Total: 38181 W: 6002 L: 5729 D: 26450

bench: 8659830
Faster castling in Chess960 case

Only rook attackers has to be considered, all other attackers are
already handled in the lines above.

No functional change.
Simplify generate<EVASIONS>

Use the newly introduced LineBB[] to simplify this
super hot-path function.

Verified with perft we don't have any speed regression, although
the number of squares removed is less than before in case of
contact check.

Insipred by DiscoCheck implementation.

Perft numbers are the same, but we have an harmless functional
change due to reorder of moves, because now some illegal moves
are no more detected at generation time, but in the search.

bench: 8331357