Revert "fix build error"

This reverts commit cf203ceefec995e0224e78123baf3a3c2fe965a0.
Revert "miss patch"

This reverts commit 383a8c9b7b7092cfcd3daec47e0f6f648ff2f6a7.
Revert "cpufreq: Use dedicated high-priority workqueues"

This reverts commit 3e941eedc73c15b5a0a5dc5369f6fded5b210555.
Revert "msm: Synchronize CPU frequency on thread migration"

This reverts commit 30282981677b487896da787822d7b96d3090ff74.
Revert "cpufreq: Use dedicated high-priority workqueues"

This reverts commit bd62fa1199fca67961445949a08c77dc9f8c6a7f.
Revert "msm: Synchronize CPU frequency on thread migration"

This reverts commit 7b2ef26e94e903a7895e0b2f624b40636e8861f7.
Revert "sched: provide per cpu-cgroup option to notify on migrations"

This reverts commit ac604317ba33d7bc82f850a81944170c2920417c.
add bug fixes
intellidemand: Don't update the policy->cur upon cpufreq driver failure
 intellidemand: allow clean compilation when LMF is disabled
https://github.com/faux123/mako/commit/5ae460a744fa0463e10db20395194cfd3d75568f
block: fiops ioscheduler core

FIOPS (Fair IOPS) ioscheduler is IOPS based ioscheduler, so only targets
for drive without I/O seek. It's quite similar like CFQ, but the dispatch
decision is made according to IOPS instead of slice.

The algorithm is simple. Drive has a service tree, and each task lives in
the tree. The key into the tree is called vios (virtual I/O). Every request
has vios, which is calculated according to its ioprio, request size and so
on. Task's vios is the sum of vios of all requests it dispatches. FIOPS
always selects task with minimum vios in the service tree and let the task
dispatch request. The dispatched request's vios is then added to the task's
vios and the task is repositioned in the sevice tree.

Unlike CFQ, FIOPS doesn't have separate sync/async queues, because with I/O
less writeback, usually a task can only dispatch either sync or async requests.
Bias read or write request can still be done with read/write scale.

One issue is if workload iodepth is lower than drive queue_depth, IOPS
share of a task might not be strictly according to its priority, request
size and so on. In this case, the drive is in idle actually. Solving the
problem need make drive idle, so impact performance. I believe CFQ isn't
completely fair between tasks in such case too.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>

Conflicts:
	block/Makefile

Conflicts:
	block/Makefile
block: fiops read/write request scale

read/write speed of Flash based storage usually is different. For example,
in my SSD maxium thoughput of read is about 3 times faster than that of
write. Add a scale to differenate read and write. Also add a tunable, so
user can assign different scale for read and write.

By default, the scale is 1:1, which means the scale is a noop.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
block: fiops sync/async scale

CFQ gives 2.5 times more share to sync workload. This matches CFQ.

Note this is different with the read/write scale. We have 3 types of
requests:
1. read
2. sync write
3. write
CFQ doesn't differentitate type 1 and 2, but request cost of 1 and 2
are usually different for flash based storage. So we have both sync/async
and read/write scale here.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
block: fiops add ioprio support

Add CFQ-like ioprio support. Priority A will get 20% more share than priority
A+1, which matches CFQ.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
block: fiops preserve vios key for deep queue depth workload

If the task has running request, even it's added into service tree newly,
we preserve its vios key, so it will not lost its share. This should work
for task driving big queue depth. For single depth task, there is no approach
to preserve its vios key.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
block: fiops bias sync workload

If there are async requests running, delay async workload. Otherwise
async workload (usually very deep iodepth) will use all queue iodepth
and later sync requests will get long delayed. The idea is from CFQ.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
block: fiops add some trace information

Add some trace information, which is helpful when I do debugging.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
dynamic fsync: don't disable fdatasync()
Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>
cpufreq: ondemand: Fix store_powersave_bias() race with hotplug

store_powersave_bias() assumes that CPUs will not be taken offline or
brought online while executing its for_each_online_cpu() loops. Fix
this race by blocking hotplug while executing in these loop.

CRs-Fixed: 494407
Change-Id: I0d5520444ec21a8d9b12fb73c06ac8442449fa85
Signed-off-by: Matt Wagantall <mattw@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: ondemand: Fix locking in store_powersave_bias

store_powersave_bias() assumes that dbs_info->cur_policy will
not change while it is executing. If it does, memory corruption
can potentially result. Fix this by acquiring the dbs_lock.

Most noticeably, this resolves timer-related list corruptions
encountered when queue_delayed_work_on() is called from within
store_powersave_bias() while a CPU is being hotplugged in and
out.

CRs-Fixed: 494407
Change-Id: I0fd5cbef6834545274cad9481e574ec50b37b871
Signed-off-by: Matt Wagantall <mattw@codeaurora.org>