SI-7200 Test case for fixed type inference error.

Broken in 2.9.2 and 2.10.0, but working in 2.10.1

--- sandbox/2.10.0.log
+++ sandbox/2.10.1.log
       def coflatMap[A >: Nothing <: Any, B >: Nothing <: Any](f: Test.Nel[A] => B): Test.Nel[A] => Test.Nel[B] = ((l: Test.Nel[A]) => Test.this.Nel.apply[B](f.apply(l), l.tail match {
         case immutable.this.Nil => immutable.this.Nil
-        case (hd: A, tl: List[A])scala.collection.immutable.::[A]((h @ _), (t @ _)) => {
-          val r: Test.Nel[Nothing] = NelFoo.this.coflatMap[A, Nothing](f).apply(Test.this.Nel.apply[A](h, t));
+        case (hd: A, tl: List[A])scala.collection.immutable.::[?A1]((h @ _), (t @ _)) => {
+          val r: Test.Nel[B] = NelFoo.this.coflatMap[A, B](f).apply(Test.this.Nel.apply[A](h, t));
           {
-            <synthetic> val x$1: Nothing = r.head;
-            r.tail.::[Nothing](x$1)
+            <synthetic> val x$1: B = r.head;
+            r.tail.::[B](x$1)
           }
         }
       }))

b74c33eb86 represents the exact moment of progression. Comments
in pos/t7200b.scala, a minimal test that demonstrates the problem
without type constructors or code execution, pinpoint the line of
code responsible for the fix.

Incidentally, I'm currently on a train somewhere between Solothurn
and Biel, and am consequently without the power of scala-bisector.
Undeterred, and inspired by a line I saw in Skyfall last night
("sometimes the olds ways are better"), I just pulled off a two-hop
bisection. Take that, O(log N)!

The one remaining worry is the appearance of the type variable
?A1 in the output of -Xprint:typer for run/t7200.scala.
SI-7330 better error when pattern isn't a value

Somehow an applied type managed to sneak past the type checker in pattern mode.
Patterns must be values, though.

`case C[_] =>` was probably meant to be `case _: C[_] =>`
Advice is dispensed accordingly. (Generalizing the existing advice machinery.)
Interactive scaladoc: mark new typer run when done.

As of now, when backgroundCompile is in the same typer run as
scaladoc-fetching logic, typer is confused with stale symbols.
Quiet down overloaded implicit warning.

Apparently implicit classes product both a method symbol and
a module symbol, both of which are marked implicit, which left
this warning code believing there was an overloaded implicit
method.
Merge pull request #2322 from retronym/ticket/7200

SI-7200 Test case for fixed type inference error.
SI-6675 Avoid spurious warning about pattern bind arity.

In 692372ce, we added a warning (under -Xlint) when binding
a `TupleN` in to a single pattern binder, which wasn't allowed
before 2.10.0, and more often than not represents a bug.

However, that warning overstretched, and warned even when
using a Tuple Pattern to bind to the elements of such a value.

This commit checks for this case, and avoids the spurious warnings.

A new test case is added for this case to go with the existing
test for SI-6675:

    $ ./tools/partest-ack 6675
    % tests-with-matching-paths      ...  3
    % tests-with-matching-code       ...  2
    # 3 tests to run.
    test/partest --show-diff --show-log                  \
      test/files/neg/t6675-old-patmat.scala              \
      test/files/neg/t6675.scala                         \
      test/files/pos/t6675.scala                         \
      ""

    Testing individual files
    testing: [...]/files/pos/t6675.scala                                  [  OK  ]

    Testing individual files
    testing: [...]/files/neg/t6675-old-patmat.scala                       [  OK  ]
    testing: [...]/files/neg/t6675.scala                                  [  OK  ]
    All of 3 tests were successful (elapsed time: 00:00:03)
Merge pull request #2410 from paulp/pr/parameterized-implicit

Quiet down overloaded implicit warning.
Merge pull request #2358 from adriaanm/ticket-7330

SI-7330 better error when pattern's not a value
Merge pull request #2387 from vigdorchik/interactive_scaladoc

Interactive scaladoc: demand new typer run when done.
Warn on selection of vals from DelayedInit subclasses.

Which are likely to yield null, if the program didn't start.

This is a common source of confusion for people new to
the language, as was seen during the Coursera course.

The test case shows that the usage pattern within Specs2
won't generate these warnings.
SI-7355 Handle spaces in paths in Windows batch files.

Changed "%1%" and %2% to "%~1" and %~2 to allow spaces
in paths by surrounding quotes according to advice at:

  http://stackoverflow.com/questions/473117/pass-path-with-spaces-as-parameter-to-bat-file
  http://ss64.com/nt/syntax-args.html
Merge pull request #2435 from retronym/ticket/7355

SI-7355 Handle spaces in paths in Windows batch files.
Merge pull request #2420 from retronym/ticket/6675-2

SI-6675 Avoid spurious warning about pattern bind arity.
SI-7369 Avoid spurious unreachable warnings in patterns

Unreachability analysis draws on the enumerated domain of types
(e.g sealed subclasses + null, or true/false), and also looks at all
stable identifier patterns tested for equality against the same 'slot'
in a pattern.

It was drawing the wrong conclusions about stable identifier patterns.
Unlike the domain constants, two such values may hold the same value,
so we can't assume that matching X precludes matching Y in the same
slot in a subsequent case.

For example:

    val X: Boolean = true; val Y: Boolean = true
    def m1(t1: Tuple1[Boolean]) = t1 match {
      case Tuple1(true) =>
      case Tuple1(false) =>
      case Tuple1(false) => // correctly unreachable
    }
    def m2(t1: Tuple1[Boolean]) = t1 match {
      case Tuple1(X) =>
      case Tuple1(Y) => // spurious unreachable warning
    }

    //
    // Before
    //
    reachability, vars:
    V2: Boolean ::= true | false// Set(false, Y, X, true) // = x1._1
    V1: (Boolean,) ::= null | ... // = x1
    equality axioms:
      V2=true#4  \/ V2=false#5  /\
     -V2=false#5 \/  -V2=Y#3    /\
     -V2=false#5 \/  -V2=X#2    /\
     -V2=false#5 \/ -V2=true#4  /\
       -V2=Y#3   \/  -V2=X#2    /\
       -V2=Y#3   \/ -V2=true#4  /\
       -V2=X#2   \/ -V2=true#4

    //
    // After
    //
    reachability, vars:
    V2: Boolean ::= true | false// Set(false, Y, X, true) // = x1._1
    V1: (Boolean,) ::= null | ... // = x1
    equality axioms:
      V2=true#4  \/ V2=false#5  /\
     -V2=false#5 \/ -V2=true#4
SI-7367 scaladoc crash on constructing the model for annotations.

Scaladoc only checks primary constructor when building annotation
model.

Here we instead find the constructor matching the annotation's symbol.
Also change TreeFactory.makeTree to return TreeEntity rather than
Option[TreeEntity] and force the caller check for EmptyTree.
SI-6943 warn on value class miscomparison.

There's a very dangerous situation running around when you
combine universal equality with value classes:

  // All over your code
  val x = "abc"
  if (x == "abc") ...

  // Hey let's make x a value class
  val x = new ValueClass("abc")
  // Uh-oh

There was until now no warning when comparing a value class
with something else. Now there is.
Merge pull request #2444 from paulp/pr/value-class-cmp-warning

SI-6943 warn on value class miscomparison.
Update links to old website, in preparation for launch.

Removed the contact form, since it's redundant with mailing lists and
issue tracker.
Merge pull request #2448 from namin/update-links

Update links to old website, in preparation for launch.
Corrects link in README.rst