Gen-ART 82

From: Mary Barnes

Description: - Section 2.  
 --General: It would be helpful if the terms were alphabetized. 
 --Node: "We use the term "Node" to refer to …" -> "Refers to …"
 - Section 5.3.1.1 [6.3.1.1]: First two sentences can be reworded more succinctly - you're not really providing definitions here, put rather describing the syntax for and providing examples illustrative of the presentation language.
  OLD:     The following definitions are used throughout RELOAD and so are  defined here.  They also provide a convenient introduction to how to read the presentation language.
 NEW:    This section provides an introduction to the presentation language used throughout RELOAD. 
 - Section 5.5.1.6 [6.5.1.6]: Add references for SCTP and DCCP. 
 - Section 9.7.4.3 [10.7.4.3], 3rd para: 
 -- Remove "Note to implementers".  Text already highlights that the text isspecific to implementations. 
- Section 9.8 [10.8]:  "For this topology plugin" -> "For Chord-RELOAD"
- Section 11 [12]: 
- General: there are no labels for any of the call flows, so it's not always clear what the text is referring to.  In general, I think the text precedes the flow.
- Section 6.1.1, last bullet:  "later" -> "latter"
- Section 6.1.3: Shouldn't this be "For example," rather than "I.e.,"?  If "I.e.," is appropriate in that those are the only routing algorithms which might be used, then I would suggest adjusting the sentence structure by using words rather than the abbreviation (it's debatable whether the latter is grammatically correct) to something like.  "This means that a node…".

Notes: Note that this contains to all the nits that are not yet fixed.