OK, that was my intention in the first place. I will not do any more work on this until (and if) consensus on what is the right thing to do here is reached among CAS committers :-)


Cheers,
D.
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Scott <notifications@github.com> wrote:

>> @@ -25,11 +25,18 @@ cas1ServiceSuccessView.(class)=org.jasig.cas.web.view.Cas10ResponseView
>>  cas1ServiceSuccessView.successResponse=true
>>  
>>  ### CAS 2.0 Response Protocol Views
>> +cas2ServiceSuccessView.(class)=org.springframework.web.servlet.view.JstlView
>> +cas2ServiceSuccessView.url=/WEB-INF/view/jsp/protocol/2.0/casServiceValidationSuccess.jsp
>> +
>> +cas2ServiceFailureView.(class)=org.springframework.web.servlet.view.JstlView
>> +cas2ServiceFailureView.url=/WEB-INF/view/jsp/protocol/2.0/casServiceValidationFailure.jsp
> I don't think its valid to remove 2.0.  There is a 2.0 protocol, and those files support it explicitly.  
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/Jasig/cas/pull/224/files#r3711733