I tried to use each of those, but somehow I couldn't get my test to work
without breaking other tests. In the end the best solution I found was
adding another data set. There is probably a better long term solution, but
I didn't want to make this pull request contingent on fixing those issues.

Bago


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Ariel Rokem <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In dipy/data/__init__.py:
>
> > @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ def get_data(name='small_64D'):
> >          return pjoin(THIS_DIR, 'dsi515_b_table.txt')
> >      if name == 'grad514':
> >          return pjoin(THIS_DIR, 'grad_514.txt')
> > +    if name == "small_25":
>
> Do you really need this new data set? Can't you use the small 64D set, or
> the small 101D set?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/nipy/dipy/pull/163/files#r3611928>
> .
>