working on ad-hoc dual directorship amendment

The goal here is two-fold:
* Allow current Eboard members to hold non-voting positions, such that voting members can also be ad-hoc directors
* Not restrict ad-hoc directorships to single directorship. 

Why these changes? YoungMoney and I, current voting members of Eboard, want to start an ad-hoc Web committee to standardize things, coordinate projects, etc. Strictly following the constitution, we are currently unable to do so.

A side effect of the current wording is that we can have multiple secretaries, or a voting Eboard member can also be secretary. I don't really see a problem with this.

Let me know if you have better wording suggestions.