Yeah that's a good point actually Jan. It'd definitely make sense however
would break the public api. Only a very minor migration though so let's do
it :-)
On 24 Jun 2013 17:51, "Jan Machacek" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In src/main/scala/org/specs2/spring/Specification.scala:
>
> > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ trait SpecificationEnvironment {
> >   *
> >   * @author janmachacek
> >   */
> > -trait Specification extends org.specs2.mutable.Specification
> > +trait Specification extends org.specs2.mutable.SpecificationLike
>
> Would it make sense to follow the naming convention and use
> SpecificationLike here, too?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/eigengo/specs2-spring/pull/29/files#r4846356>
> .
>