No, this doesn't apply to section names.  The deleted ```if```` test was meant to distinguish dependency graph strings from other items called "graph", but being poorly designed it was excluding non-cycling graph strings.  For this change I was thinking it's safe to test just the item name because there will n ever be a non dependency graph item in the suite definition spec called "graph".   But maybe that's a lazy assumption ... *and* anyhow there is a problem I didn't think of - repeated instances of an environment variable called "graph", defined in the same namespace, would get added together. Vanishingly unlikely, but I'll do it properly just in case...