I think marking them abstract makes sense.


Norman Maurer wrote:
> In 
> websockets/src/main/java/io/undertow/websockets/highlevel/AssembledFrameHandlerAdapter.java:
>
> >  + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
> >  + * limitations under the License.
> >  + */
> >  +package io.undertow.websockets.highlevel;
> >  +
> >  +
> >  +import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
> >  +
> >  +/**
> >  + *
> >  + * Adapter class for {@link AssembledFrameHandler} implementations. Sub-classes can override the methods to provide
> >  + * an implementation.
> >  + *
> >  + * @author<a href="mailto:nmaurer@redhat.com">Norman Maurer</a>
> >  + */
> >  +public class AssembledFrameHandlerAdapter extends FrameHandlerAdapter implements AssembledFrameHandler {
>
> We could do this but should also make them abstract in that case. Or 
> we could use call them Simple* , not sure what is better. WDYT ?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
> <https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/pull/33/files#r2839133>.
>