I've added the line brake before dodekaton in l12 and renumbered l12 to l13. as in SB.

I've added two minor corrections to l9:
The end of the crossbar of the epsilon is still visible before pediadon, cf. the epsilon in the previous line (en onomati...). For e pediadon cf. http://papyri.info/search?DATE_MODE=LOOSE&DATE_START_TEXT=700&DATE_START_ERA=CE&DOCS_PER_PAGE=15&STRING1=%CF%80%CE%B5%CE%B4%CE%B9%CE%B1%CE%B4%CF%89%CE%BD&target1=TEXT&no_caps1=on&no_marks1=on.

At the end of l9, I don't like: κ(α)τὰ Ἄ[ρ(αβας)]. It would be very unusual to have the final alpha after the raised tau in κ(α)τὰ that indicates the abbreviation. I assume the scribe wrote two alphas out of carelessness. Furthermore, I see traces of a long vertical stroke after the second alpha that may well belong to a rho, cf. the rhos in Korra  (l8). Above this stroke, I see a horizontal line that suggets a superscript alpha, cf. diakosia(s) in l11.

Both new readings have been checked against the original.Data Entry Error


 - I've added the line brake before dodekaton in l12 and renumbered l12 to l13. as in SB.

I've added two minor corrections to l9:
The end of the crossbar of the epsilon is still visible before pediadon, cf. the epsilon in the previous line (en onomati...). For e pediadon cf. http://papyri.info/search?DATE_MODE=LOOSE&DATE_START_TEXT=700&DATE_START_ERA=CE&DOCS_PER_PAGE=15&STRING1=%CF%80%CE%B5%CE%B4%CE%B9%CE%B1%CE%B4%CF%89%CE%BD&target1=TEXT&no_caps1=on&no_marks1=on.

At the end of l9, I don't like: κ(α)τὰ Ἄ[ρ(αβας)]. It would be very unusual to have the final alpha after the raised tau in κ(α)τὰ that indicates the abbreviation. I assume the scribe wrote two alphas out of carelessness. Furthermore, I see traces of a long vertical stroke after the second alpha that may well belong to a rho, cf. the rhos in Korra  (l8). Above this stroke, I see a horizontal line that suggets a superscript alpha, cf. diakosia(s) in l11.

Both new readings have been checked against the original.Data Entry Error

Signed-off-by: Joshua D. Sosin <joshuad.sosin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Cowey <james.cowey@urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rodney Ast <simoeis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Heilporn <paul.heilporn@unistra.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kruse <thomas.kruse@oeaw.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Cisca Hoogendijk <ciscahoogendijk@live.nl>
Signed-off-by: Graham Claytor <gclaytor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Depauw <mark.depauw@arts.kuleuven.be>
Signed-off-by: Lajos Berkes <berkes.lajos@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Georg Schmelz <georg.schmelz@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alain Delattre <adelattr@ulb.ac.be>
Signed-off-by: Jenny Cromwell <jenniferacromwell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tonia Sarri <toniasarri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian-Jürgen Gruber <morunculus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hélène Cuvigny <h.cuvigny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: W. Graham Claytor <gclaytor@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Verhoogt <verhoogt@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Esther Garel <esthergarel@gmail.com>
Update revisionDesc

 - Vote - AcceptText - Accept line break. Accept reading epsilon l. 9 (confirmed on published photo).
I understand B's problem with l. 9 κ(α)τα, but do not agree with his solution of "carelessness": the same form is found in the parallel texts SB 5644, 5649, 5650, 5652, 5653, 5654. I would rather keep the reading of the edition. Accept the traces of rho and alpha. (Cisca Hoogendijk)
 - Vote - AcceptText - I wrote to N. Gonis to ask for an opinion. He replied: "I see Cisca's point." He did not, however, have any books to hand to check the reading. L. Berkes has seen the reservations pointed out by F.A.J. Hoogendijk and has now proposed a different reading, which I was able to verify on the original. (James Cowey)
 - Finalized - Ready. (James Cowey)