I think the only older rpm that we would normally worry about is what is on
AIX


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Josh Partlow <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In spec/unit/provider/package/rpm_spec.rb:
>
> > @@ -156,7 +171,7 @@
> >
> >      describe "on an ancient RPM" do
> >        before(:each) do
> > -        Puppet::Util::Execution.expects(:execute).with(["/bin/rpm", "-q",  "myresource", '', '', "--qf", "%{NAME} %|EPOCH?{%{EPOCH}}:{0}| %{VERSION} %{RELEASE} %{ARCH}\n"], {:failonfail => true, :combine => true, :custom_environment => {}}).returns("myresource 0 1.2.3.4 5.el4 noarch\n")
> > +        Puppet::Util::Execution.expects(:execute).with(["/bin/rpm", "-q",  "myresource", '', '', "--qf", "%{NAME} %|EPOCH?{%{EPOCH}}:{0}| %{VERSION} %{RELEASE} %{ARCH}:DESC:%{SUMMARY}\n"], {:failonfail => true, :combine => true, :custom_environment => {}}).returns("myresource 0 1.2.3.4 5.el4 noarch\n")
>
> The test differences here are looking for missing flags between rpm 3 and
> rpm 4. RHEL5 is based on Fedora 6 which is rpm 4. Do we have an older
> redhat/fedora image to test against, and how far back would we want to go?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/pull/1633/files#r4162081>
> .
>



-- 
Andrew Parker
andy@puppetlabs.com
Freenode: zaphod42
Twitter: @aparker42
Software Developer

*Join us at PuppetConf 2013, August 22-23 in San Francisco - *
http://bit.ly/pupconf13*
**Register now and take advantage of the Early Bird discount - save 25%!*