I'll tighten it up and use the "using" entry.

Wayne

On 10/16/2013 03:50 PM, Phil Haack wrote:
>
> In licenses/eclipse.txt:
>
> > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: license
> >  title: Eclipse Public License v1.0
> >  permalink: /licenses/eclipse/
> >
> > -description: Used by the Eclipse foundation for its software, this license includes reciprocal requirements in some cases.
> > +description: The Eclipse Public License (EPL 1.0) is maintained by the Eclipse Foundation. This license is a commercially friendly copyleft (e.g. reciprocal) license. Examples of non-Eclipse use of the EPL include OpenDaylight, Symbian (legacy), Clojure, Mondrian, and JUnit. Commercially friendly aspects include ability to commercially license binaries, a modern royalty-free patent license, and allows software which links to EPL code to use other licenses, including commercial ones.
>
> Also, we're trying to keep these descriptions as terse as possible. 
> Since the full name of the license is on the left, maybe the start of 
> the sentence should be:
>
>     Maintained by the Eclipse Foundation, this license...
>
> Also, I'd like to strike the list of projects using it from the 
> description. Instead, I want to add that to the metadata instead and 
> then I can work on rendering it.
>
> Perhaps:
>
> |in-use-by:
>    - Clojure
>    - JUnit
>    - ...
> |
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
> <https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/pull/98/files#r7013612>.
>

-- 
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation 
<http://www.eclipse.org>
Learn about Eclipse Projects <http://www.eclipse.org/projects>
EclipseCon Europe 2013 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2013>