Review (part 1)

The content of the paper is good, but there are a few problems with the language: this last problem is going to be, in my opinion, a roadblock for publication.
Here I attempted to rephrase without changing the content, and changing a minima the text.

If this seems OK with you, please merge and your pull request on the euroscipy_proceedings website will be automatically updated. Don't hesitate to cherry pick the changes I propose.

Many thanks,
N