> It's already in the module's private section, under a private:.
Ah ok, the diff view didn't make this obvious.

> I'm unsure about pre-pending an underscore though, I think it is sufficiently qualified as-is.
In the future private symbols might even become hidden, but I was concerned about the state of affairs **now**. Funnily enough I think I have a pull that fixes the spellchecker to avoid private symbols, but I have to work on it.

Anywho it's fine as is.