Added JCAMP papers.

Created a new xls sheet that contains the Rubtsov NMR MI proposal and the orthogonal part from the Sumner MI. The sheets are sorted according to the order in which they occure in a metabolomics experiment work flow. For these metadata/MI sets the corresponding data sets are named in the Rubtsov paper Fig.2., The data sets being described in paper section 3.2 Data Sets.

The updated Rubtsov MI parts are still missing. We now should exclusively look at the FID and Spectral processing columns. For these I added a JCamp mapping column.

Naming conventions ? Take over PSI camelHump style for letter case convention ? Made names explicit and context independent

The sumner and Rubtsov MIs are not orthogonal and conflate the same parameter under differrent names and headers, i.e. Sumner/InstrumentConfig/probe, vs. Rubtsov/InstrumentDescription/probe
Another example for this is that Sumner/pulsedFieldGradient (z or x,y,z) is found under InstrumentConfiguration,whereas Rubtsov clustered it under AcquisitionParameters/InstrumentOperationDetails.
These need to be harmonized into one coherent Structural backbone within our merged MI.

O means Optional, all others are mandatory.

As we concentrate on the raw data, i.e. FID&Spectrum processing, we should look at what JCamp DX provides here (E.g. whats in http://www.jcamp-dx.org/protocols/dxnmr01.pdf and its amendments at http://www.jcamp-dx.org/protocols/dx5-01-correctedv2.pdf and http://www.jcamp-dx.org/protocols/NMR%20Pulse%20Sequences%20PAC%2079(11)%20pp1748-1764%202001.pdf)

There is also a mapping from Bruker TopSpin to JCAMP at http://www.pascal-man.com/navigation/faq-java-browser/fid-To-jcamp.shtml

For n dimensional data sets there is a JCamp proposal at http://www.jcamp-dx.org/ndnmr-index.html