Updated devel/snappy to 1.0.5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r60 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2012-02-23 18:00:36 +0100 (Thu, 23 Feb 2012) | 57 lines

For 32-bit platforms, do not try to accelerate multiple neighboring
32-bit loads with a 64-bit load during compression (it's not a win).

The main target for this optimization is ARM, but 32-bit x86 gets
a small gain, too, although there is noise in the microbenchmarks.
It's a no-op for 64-bit x86. It does not affect decompression.

Microbenchmark results on a Cortex-A9 1GHz, using g++ 4.6.2 (from
Ubuntu/Linaro), -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wa,-march=armv7a -mtune=cortex-a9
-mthumb-interwork, minimum 1000 iterations:

  Benchmark            Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  ---------------------------------------------------
  BM_ZFlat/0            1158277    1160000       1000 84.2MB/s  html (23.57 %)    [ +4.3%]
  BM_ZFlat/1           14861782   14860000       1000 45.1MB/s  urls (50.89 %)    [ +1.1%]
  BM_ZFlat/2             393595     390000       1000 310.5MB/s  jpg (99.88 %)    [ +0.0%]
  BM_ZFlat/3             650583     650000       1000 138.4MB/s  pdf (82.13 %)    [ +3.1%]
  BM_ZFlat/4            4661480    4660000       1000 83.8MB/s  html4 (23.55 %)   [ +4.3%]
  BM_ZFlat/5             491973     490000       1000 47.9MB/s  cp (48.12 %)      [ +2.0%]
  BM_ZFlat/6             193575     192678       1038 55.2MB/s  c (42.40 %)       [ +9.0%]
  BM_ZFlat/7              62343      62754       3187 56.5MB/s  lsp (48.37 %)     [ +2.6%]
  BM_ZFlat/8           17708468   17710000       1000 55.5MB/s  xls (41.34 %)     [ -0.3%]
  BM_ZFlat/9            3755345    3760000       1000 38.6MB/s  txt1 (59.81 %)    [ +8.2%]
  BM_ZFlat/10           3324217    3320000       1000 36.0MB/s  txt2 (64.07 %)    [ +4.2%]
  BM_ZFlat/11          10139932   10140000       1000 40.1MB/s  txt3 (57.11 %)    [ +6.4%]
  BM_ZFlat/12          13532109   13530000       1000 34.0MB/s  txt4 (68.35 %)    [ +5.0%]
  BM_ZFlat/13           4690847    4690000       1000 104.4MB/s  bin (18.21 %)    [ +4.1%]
  BM_ZFlat/14            830682     830000       1000 43.9MB/s  sum (51.88 %)     [ +1.2%]
  BM_ZFlat/15             84784      85011       2235 47.4MB/s  man (59.36 %)     [ +1.1%]
  BM_ZFlat/16           1293254    1290000       1000 87.7MB/s  pb (23.15 %)      [ +2.3%]
  BM_ZFlat/17           2775155    2780000       1000 63.2MB/s  gaviota (38.27 %) [+12.2%]

Core i7 in 32-bit mode (only one run and 100 iterations, though, so noisy):

  Benchmark            Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  ---------------------------------------------------
  BM_ZFlat/0             227582     223464       3043 437.0MB/s  html (23.57 %)    [ +7.4%]
  BM_ZFlat/1            2982430    2918455        233 229.4MB/s  urls (50.89 %)    [ +2.9%]
  BM_ZFlat/2              46967      46658      15217 2.5GB/s  jpg (99.88 %)       [ +0.0%]
  BM_ZFlat/3             115298     114864       5833 783.2MB/s  pdf (82.13 %)     [ +1.5%]
  BM_ZFlat/4             913440     899743        778 434.2MB/s  html4 (23.55 %)   [ +0.3%]
  BM_ZFlat/5             110302     108571       7000 216.1MB/s  cp (48.12 %)      [ +0.0%]
  BM_ZFlat/6              44409      43372      15909 245.2MB/s  c (42.40 %)       [ +0.8%]
  BM_ZFlat/7              15713      15643      46667 226.9MB/s  lsp (48.37 %)     [ +2.7%]
  BM_ZFlat/8            2625539    2602230        269 377.4MB/s  xls (41.34 %)     [ +1.4%]
  BM_ZFlat/9             808884     811429        875 178.8MB/s  txt1 (59.81 %)    [ -3.9%]
  BM_ZFlat/10            709532     700000       1000 170.5MB/s  txt2 (64.07 %)    [ +0.0%]
  BM_ZFlat/11           2177682    2162162        333 188.2MB/s  txt3 (57.11 %)    [ -1.4%]
  BM_ZFlat/12           2849640    2840000        250 161.8MB/s  txt4 (68.35 %)    [ -1.4%]
  BM_ZFlat/13            849760     835476        778 585.8MB/s  bin (18.21 %)     [ +1.2%]
  BM_ZFlat/14            165940     164571       4375 221.6MB/s  sum (51.88 %)     [ +1.4%]
  BM_ZFlat/15             20939      20571      35000 196.0MB/s  man (59.36 %)     [ +2.1%]
  BM_ZFlat/16            239209     236544       2917 478.1MB/s  pb (23.15 %)      [ +4.2%]
  BM_ZFlat/17            616206     610000       1000 288.2MB/s  gaviota (38.27 %) [ -1.6%]

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r59 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2012-02-21 18:02:17 +0100 (Tue, 21 Feb 2012) | 107 lines

Enable the use of unaligned loads and stores for ARM-based architectures
where they are available (ARMv7 and higher). This gives a significant
speed boost on ARM, both for compression and decompression.
It should not affect x86 at all.

There are more changes possible to speed up ARM, but it might not be
that easy to do without hurting x86 or making the code uglier.
Also, we de not try to use NEON yet.

Microbenchmark results on a Cortex-A9 1GHz, using g++ 4.6.2 (from Ubuntu/Linaro),
-O2 -DNDEBUG -Wa,-march=armv7a -mtune=cortex-a9 -mthumb-interwork:

Benchmark            Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
---------------------------------------------------
BM_UFlat/0             524806     529100        378 184.6MB/s  html            [+33.6%]
BM_UFlat/1            5139790    5200000        100 128.8MB/s  urls            [+28.8%]
BM_UFlat/2              86540      84166       1901 1.4GB/s  jpg               [ +0.6%]
BM_UFlat/3             215351     210176        904 428.0MB/s  pdf             [+29.8%]
BM_UFlat/4            2144490    2100000        100 186.0MB/s  html4           [+33.3%]
BM_UFlat/5             194482     190000       1000 123.5MB/s  cp              [+36.2%]
BM_UFlat/6              91843      90175       2107 117.9MB/s  c               [+38.6%]
BM_UFlat/7              28535      28426       6684 124.8MB/s  lsp             [+34.7%]
BM_UFlat/8            9206600    9200000        100 106.7MB/s  xls             [+42.4%]
BM_UFlat/9            1865273    1886792        106 76.9MB/s  txt1             [+32.5%]
BM_UFlat/10           1576809    1587301        126 75.2MB/s  txt2             [+32.3%]
BM_UFlat/11           4968450    4900000        100 83.1MB/s  txt3             [+32.7%]
BM_UFlat/12           6673970    6700000        100 68.6MB/s  txt4             [+32.8%]
BM_UFlat/13           2391470    2400000        100 203.9MB/s  bin             [+29.2%]
BM_UFlat/14            334601     344827        522 105.8MB/s  sum             [+30.6%]
BM_UFlat/15             37404      38080       5252 105.9MB/s  man             [+33.8%]
BM_UFlat/16            535470     540540        370 209.2MB/s  pb              [+31.2%]
BM_UFlat/17           1875245    1886792        106 93.2MB/s  gaviota          [+37.8%]
BM_UValidate/0         178425     179533       1114 543.9MB/s  html            [ +2.7%]
BM_UValidate/1        2100450    2000000        100 334.8MB/s  urls            [ +5.0%]
BM_UValidate/2           1039       1044     172413 113.3GB/s  jpg             [ +3.4%]
BM_UValidate/3          59423      59470       3363 1.5GB/s  pdf               [ +7.8%]
BM_UValidate/4         760716     766283        261 509.8MB/s  html4           [ +6.5%]
BM_ZFlat/0            1204632    1204819        166 81.1MB/s  html (23.57 %)   [+32.8%]
BM_ZFlat/1           15656190   15600000        100 42.9MB/s  urls (50.89 %)   [+27.6%]
BM_ZFlat/2             403336     410677        487 294.8MB/s  jpg (99.88 %)   [+16.5%]
BM_ZFlat/3             664073     671140        298 134.0MB/s  pdf (82.13 %)   [+28.4%]
BM_ZFlat/4            4961940    4900000        100 79.7MB/s  html4 (23.55 %)  [+30.6%]
BM_ZFlat/5             500664     501253        399 46.8MB/s  cp (48.12 %)     [+33.4%]
BM_ZFlat/6             217276     215982        926 49.2MB/s  c (42.40 %)      [+25.0%]
BM_ZFlat/7              64122      65487       3054 54.2MB/s  lsp (48.37 %)    [+36.1%]
BM_ZFlat/8           18045730   18000000        100 54.6MB/s  xls (41.34 %)    [+34.4%]
BM_ZFlat/9            4051530    4000000        100 36.3MB/s  txt1 (59.81 %)   [+25.0%]
BM_ZFlat/10           3451800    3500000        100 34.1MB/s  txt2 (64.07 %)   [+25.7%]
BM_ZFlat/11          11052340   11100000        100 36.7MB/s  txt3 (57.11 %)   [+24.3%]
BM_ZFlat/12          14538690   14600000        100 31.5MB/s  txt4 (68.35 %)   [+24.7%]
BM_ZFlat/13           5041850    5000000        100 97.9MB/s  bin (18.21 %)    [+32.0%]
BM_ZFlat/14            908840     909090        220 40.1MB/s  sum (51.88 %)    [+22.2%]
BM_ZFlat/15             86921      86206       1972 46.8MB/s  man (59.36 %)    [+42.2%]
BM_ZFlat/16           1312315    1315789        152 86.0MB/s  pb (23.15 %)     [+34.5%]
BM_ZFlat/17           3173120    3200000        100 54.9MB/s  gaviota (38.27%) [+28.1%]


The move from 64-bit to 32-bit operations for the copies also affected 32-bit x86;
positive on the decompression side, and slightly negative on the compression side
(unless that is noise; I only ran once):

Benchmark              Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
-----------------------------------------------------
BM_UFlat/0                86279      86140       7778 1.1GB/s  html             [ +7.5%]
BM_UFlat/1               839265     822622        778 813.9MB/s  urls           [ +9.4%]
BM_UFlat/2                 9180       9143      87500 12.9GB/s  jpg             [ +1.2%]
BM_UFlat/3                35080      35000      20000 2.5GB/s  pdf              [+10.1%]
BM_UFlat/4               350318     345000       2000 1.1GB/s  html4            [ +7.0%]
BM_UFlat/5                33808      33472      21212 701.0MB/s  cp             [ +9.0%]
BM_UFlat/6                15201      15214      46667 698.9MB/s  c              [+14.9%]
BM_UFlat/7                 4652       4651     159091 762.9MB/s  lsp            [ +7.5%]
BM_UFlat/8              1285551    1282528        538 765.7MB/s  xls            [+10.7%]
BM_UFlat/9               282510     281690       2414 514.9MB/s  txt1           [+13.6%]
BM_UFlat/10              243494     239286       2800 498.9MB/s  txt2           [+14.4%]
BM_UFlat/11              743625     740000       1000 550.0MB/s  txt3           [+14.3%]
BM_UFlat/12              999441     989717        778 464.3MB/s  txt4           [+16.1%]
BM_UFlat/13              412402     410076       1707 1.2GB/s  bin              [ +7.3%]
BM_UFlat/14               54876      54000      10000 675.3MB/s  sum            [+13.0%]
BM_UFlat/15                6146       6100     100000 660.8MB/s  man            [+14.8%]
BM_UFlat/16               90496      90286       8750 1.2GB/s  pb               [ +4.0%]
BM_UFlat/17              292650     292000       2500 602.0MB/s  gaviota        [+18.1%]
BM_UValidate/0            49620      49699      14286 1.9GB/s  html             [ +0.0%]
BM_UValidate/1           501371     500000       1000 1.3GB/s  urls             [ +0.0%]
BM_UValidate/2              232        227    3043478 521.5GB/s  jpg            [ +1.3%]
BM_UValidate/3            17250      17143      43750 5.1GB/s  pdf              [ -1.3%]
BM_UValidate/4           198643     200000       3500 1.9GB/s  html4            [ -0.9%]
BM_ZFlat/0               227128     229415       3182 425.7MB/s  html (23.57 %) [ -1.4%]
BM_ZFlat/1              2970089    2960000        250 226.2MB/s  urls (50.89 %) [ -1.9%]
BM_ZFlat/2                45683      44999      15556 2.6GB/s  jpg (99.88 %)    [ +2.2%]
BM_ZFlat/3               114661     113136       6364 795.1MB/s  pdf (82.13 %)  [ -1.5%]
BM_ZFlat/4               919702     914286        875 427.2MB/s  html4 (23.55%) [ -1.3%]
BM_ZFlat/5               108189     108422       6364 216.4MB/s  cp (48.12 %)   [ -1.2%]
BM_ZFlat/6                44525      44000      15909 241.7MB/s  c (42.40 %)    [ -2.9%]
BM_ZFlat/7                15973      15857      46667 223.8MB/s  lsp (48.37 %)  [ +0.0%]
BM_ZFlat/8              2677888    2639405        269 372.1MB/s  xls (41.34 %)  [ -1.4%]
BM_ZFlat/9               800715     780000       1000 186.0MB/s  txt1 (59.81 %) [ -0.4%]
BM_ZFlat/10              700089     700000       1000 170.5MB/s  txt2 (64.07 %) [ -2.9%]
BM_ZFlat/11             2159356    2138365        318 190.3MB/s  txt3 (57.11 %) [ -0.3%]
BM_ZFlat/12             2796143    2779923        259 165.3MB/s  txt4 (68.35 %) [ -1.4%]
BM_ZFlat/13              856458     835476        778 585.8MB/s  bin (18.21 %)  [ -0.1%]
BM_ZFlat/14              166908     166857       4375 218.6MB/s  sum (51.88 %)  [ -1.4%]
BM_ZFlat/15               21181      20857      35000 193.3MB/s  man (59.36 %)  [ -0.8%]
BM_ZFlat/16              244009     239973       2917 471.3MB/s  pb (23.15 %)   [ -1.4%]
BM_ZFlat/17              596362     590000       1000 297.9MB/s  gaviota (38.27%) [ +0.0%]

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r58 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2012-02-11 23:11:22 +0100 (Sat, 11 Feb 2012) | 9 lines

Lower the size allocated in the "corrupted input" unit test from 256 MB
to 2 MB. This fixes issues with running the unit test on platforms with
little RAM (e.g. some ARM boards).

Also, reactivate the 2 MB test for 64-bit platforms; there's no good
reason why it shouldn't be.

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r57 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2012-01-08 18:55:48 +0100 (Sun, 08 Jan 2012) | 2 lines

Minor refactoring to accomodate changes in Google's internal code tree.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r56 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2012-01-04 14:10:46 +0100 (Wed, 04 Jan 2012) | 19 lines

Fix public issue r57: Fix most warnings with -Wall, mostly signed/unsigned
warnings. There are still some in the unit test, but the main .cc file should
be clean. We haven't enabled -Wall for the default build, since the unit test
is still not clean.

This also fixes a real bug in the open-source implementation of
ReadFileToStringOrDie(); it would not detect errors correctly.

I had to go through some pains to avoid performance loss as the types
were changed; I think there might still be some with 32-bit if and only if LFS
is enabled (ie., size_t is 64-bit), but for regular 32-bit and 64-bit I can't
see any losses, and I've diffed the generated GCC assembler between the old and
new code without seeing any significant choices. If anything, it's ever so
slightly faster.

This may or may not enable compression of very large blocks (>2^32 bytes)
when size_t is 64-bit, but I haven't checked, and it is still not a supported
case.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r55 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2012-01-04 11:46:39 +0100 (Wed, 04 Jan 2012) | 6 lines

Add a framing format description. We do not have any implementation of this at
the current point, but there seems to be enough of a general interest in the
topic (cf. public bug #34).

R=csilvers,sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r54 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-12-05 22:27:26 +0100 (Mon, 05 Dec 2011) | 81 lines

Speed up decompression by moving the refill check to the end of the loop.

This seems to work because in most of the branches, the compiler can evaluate
“ip_limit_ - ip” in a more efficient way than reloading ip_limit_ from memory
(either by already having the entire expression in a register, or reconstructing
it from “avail”, or something else). Memory loads, even from L1, are seemingly
costly in the big picture at the current decompression speeds.

Microbenchmarks (64-bit, opt mode):

Westmere (Intel Core i7):

  Benchmark     Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  --------------------------------------------
  BM_UFlat/0       74492      74491     187894 1.3GB/s  html      [ +5.9%]
  BM_UFlat/1      712268     712263      19644 940.0MB/s  urls    [ +3.8%]
  BM_UFlat/2       10591      10590    1000000 11.2GB/s  jpg      [ -6.8%]
  BM_UFlat/3       29643      29643     469915 3.0GB/s  pdf       [ +7.9%]
  BM_UFlat/4      304669     304667      45930 1.3GB/s  html4     [ +4.8%]
  BM_UFlat/5       28508      28507     490077 823.1MB/s  cp      [ +4.0%]
  BM_UFlat/6       12415      12415    1000000 856.5MB/s  c       [ +8.6%]
  BM_UFlat/7        3415       3415    4084723 1039.0MB/s  lsp    [+18.0%]
  BM_UFlat/8      979569     979563      14261 1002.5MB/s  xls    [ +5.8%]
  BM_UFlat/9      230150     230148      60934 630.2MB/s  txt1    [ +5.2%]
  BM_UFlat/10     197167     197166      71135 605.5MB/s  txt2    [ +4.7%]
  BM_UFlat/11     607394     607390      23041 670.1MB/s  txt3    [ +5.6%]
  BM_UFlat/12     808502     808496      17316 568.4MB/s  txt4    [ +5.0%]
  BM_UFlat/13     372791     372788      37564 1.3GB/s  bin       [ +3.3%]
  BM_UFlat/14      44541      44541     313969 818.8MB/s  sum     [ +5.7%]
  BM_UFlat/15       4833       4833    2898697 834.1MB/s  man     [ +4.8%]
  BM_UFlat/16      79855      79855     175356 1.4GB/s  pb        [ +4.8%]
  BM_UFlat/17     245845     245843      56838 715.0MB/s  gaviota [ +5.8%]

Clovertown (Intel Core 2):

  Benchmark     Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  --------------------------------------------
  BM_UFlat/0      107911     107890     100000 905.1MB/s  html    [ +2.2%]
  BM_UFlat/1     1011237    1011041      10000 662.3MB/s  urls    [ +2.5%]
  BM_UFlat/2       26775      26770     523089 4.4GB/s  jpg       [ +0.0%]
  BM_UFlat/3       48103      48095     290618 1.8GB/s  pdf       [ +3.4%]
  BM_UFlat/4      437724     437644      31937 892.6MB/s  html4   [ +2.1%]
  BM_UFlat/5       39607      39600     358284 592.5MB/s  cp      [ +2.4%]
  BM_UFlat/6       18227      18224     768191 583.5MB/s  c       [ +2.7%]
  BM_UFlat/7        5171       5170    2709437 686.4MB/s  lsp     [ +3.9%]
  BM_UFlat/8     1560291    1559989       8970 629.5MB/s  xls     [ +3.6%]
  BM_UFlat/9      335401     335343      41731 432.5MB/s  txt1    [ +3.0%]
  BM_UFlat/10     287014     286963      48758 416.0MB/s  txt2    [ +2.8%]
  BM_UFlat/11     888522     888356      15752 458.1MB/s  txt3    [ +2.9%]
  BM_UFlat/12    1186600    1186378      10000 387.3MB/s  txt4    [ +3.1%]
  BM_UFlat/13     572295     572188      24468 855.4MB/s  bin     [ +2.1%]
  BM_UFlat/14      64060      64049     218401 569.4MB/s  sum     [ +4.1%]
  BM_UFlat/15       7264       7263    1916168 555.0MB/s  man     [ +1.4%]
  BM_UFlat/16     108853     108836     100000 1039.1MB/s  pb     [ +1.7%]
  BM_UFlat/17     364289     364223      38419 482.6MB/s  gaviota [ +4.9%]

Barcelona (AMD Opteron):

  Benchmark     Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  --------------------------------------------
  BM_UFlat/0      103900     103871     100000 940.2MB/s  html    [ +8.3%]
  BM_UFlat/1     1000435    1000107      10000 669.5MB/s  urls    [ +6.6%]
  BM_UFlat/2       24659      24652     567362 4.8GB/s  jpg       [ +0.1%]
  BM_UFlat/3       48206      48193     291121 1.8GB/s  pdf       [ +5.0%]
  BM_UFlat/4      421980     421850      33174 926.0MB/s  html4   [ +7.3%]
  BM_UFlat/5       40368      40357     346994 581.4MB/s  cp      [ +8.7%]
  BM_UFlat/6       19836      19830     708695 536.2MB/s  c       [ +8.0%]
  BM_UFlat/7        6100       6098    2292774 581.9MB/s  lsp     [ +9.0%]
  BM_UFlat/8     1693093    1692514       8261 580.2MB/s  xls     [ +8.0%]
  BM_UFlat/9      365991     365886      38225 396.4MB/s  txt1    [ +7.1%]
  BM_UFlat/10     311330     311238      44950 383.6MB/s  txt2    [ +7.6%]
  BM_UFlat/11     975037     974737      14376 417.5MB/s  txt3    [ +6.9%]
  BM_UFlat/12    1303558    1303175      10000 352.6MB/s  txt4    [ +7.3%]
  BM_UFlat/13     517448     517290      27144 946.2MB/s  bin     [ +5.5%]
  BM_UFlat/14      66537      66518     210352 548.3MB/s  sum     [ +7.5%]
  BM_UFlat/15       7976       7974    1760383 505.6MB/s  man     [ +5.6%]
  BM_UFlat/16     103121     103092     100000 1097.0MB/s  pb     [ +8.7%]
  BM_UFlat/17     391431     391314      35733 449.2MB/s  gaviota [ +6.5%]

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r53 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-11-23 12:14:17 +0100 (Wed, 23 Nov 2011) | 88 lines

Speed up decompression by making the fast path for literals faster.

We do the fast-path step as soon as possible; in fact, as soon as we know the
literal length. Since we usually hit the fast path, we can then skip the checks
for long literals and available input space (beyond what the fast path check
already does).

Note that this changes the decompression Writer API; however, it does not
change the ABI, since writers are always templatized and as such never
cross compilation units. The new API is slightly more general, in that it
doesn't hard-code the value 16. Note that we also take care to check
for len <= 16 first, since the other two checks almost always succeed
(so we don't want to waste time checking for them until we have to).

The improvements are most marked on Nehalem, but are generally positive
on other platforms as well. All microbenchmarks are 64-bit, opt.

Clovertown (Core 2):

  Benchmark     Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  --------------------------------------------
  BM_UFlat/0      110226     110224     100000 886.0MB/s  html    [ +1.5%]
  BM_UFlat/1     1036523    1036508      10000 646.0MB/s  urls    [ -0.8%]
  BM_UFlat/2       26775      26775     522570 4.4GB/s  jpg       [ +0.0%]
  BM_UFlat/3       49738      49737     280974 1.8GB/s  pdf       [ +0.3%]
  BM_UFlat/4      446790     446792      31334 874.3MB/s  html4   [ +0.8%]
  BM_UFlat/5       40561      40562     350424 578.5MB/s  cp      [ +1.3%]
  BM_UFlat/6       18722      18722     746903 568.0MB/s  c       [ +1.4%]
  BM_UFlat/7        5373       5373    2608632 660.5MB/s  lsp     [ +8.3%]
  BM_UFlat/8     1615716    1615718       8670 607.8MB/s  xls     [ +2.0%]
  BM_UFlat/9      345278     345281      40481 420.1MB/s  txt1    [ +1.4%]
  BM_UFlat/10     294855     294855      47452 404.9MB/s  txt2    [ +1.6%]
  BM_UFlat/11     914263     914263      15316 445.2MB/s  txt3    [ +1.1%]
  BM_UFlat/12    1222694    1222691      10000 375.8MB/s  txt4    [ +1.4%]
  BM_UFlat/13     584495     584489      23954 837.4MB/s  bin     [ -0.6%]
  BM_UFlat/14      66662      66662     210123 547.1MB/s  sum     [ +1.2%]
  BM_UFlat/15       7368       7368    1881856 547.1MB/s  man     [ +4.0%]
  BM_UFlat/16     110727     110726     100000 1021.4MB/s  pb     [ +2.3%]
  BM_UFlat/17     382138     382141      36616 460.0MB/s  gaviota [ -0.7%]

Westmere (Core i7):

  Benchmark     Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  --------------------------------------------
  BM_UFlat/0       78861      78853     177703 1.2GB/s  html      [ +2.1%]
  BM_UFlat/1      739560     739491      18912 905.4MB/s  urls    [ +3.4%]
  BM_UFlat/2        9867       9866    1419014 12.0GB/s  jpg      [ +3.4%]
  BM_UFlat/3       31989      31986     438385 2.7GB/s  pdf       [ +0.2%]
  BM_UFlat/4      319406     319380      43771 1.2GB/s  html4     [ +1.9%]
  BM_UFlat/5       29639      29636     472862 791.7MB/s  cp      [ +5.2%]
  BM_UFlat/6       13478      13477    1000000 789.0MB/s  c       [ +2.3%]
  BM_UFlat/7        4030       4029    3475364 880.7MB/s  lsp     [ +8.7%]
  BM_UFlat/8     1036585    1036492      10000 947.5MB/s  xls     [ +6.9%]
  BM_UFlat/9      242127     242105      57838 599.1MB/s  txt1    [ +3.0%]
  BM_UFlat/10     206499     206480      67595 578.2MB/s  txt2    [ +3.4%]
  BM_UFlat/11     641635     641570      21811 634.4MB/s  txt3    [ +2.4%]
  BM_UFlat/12     848847     848769      16443 541.4MB/s  txt4    [ +3.1%]
  BM_UFlat/13     384968     384938      36366 1.2GB/s  bin       [ +0.3%]
  BM_UFlat/14      47106      47101     297770 774.3MB/s  sum     [ +4.4%]
  BM_UFlat/15       5063       5063    2772202 796.2MB/s  man     [ +7.7%]
  BM_UFlat/16      83663      83656     167697 1.3GB/s  pb        [ +1.8%]
  BM_UFlat/17     260224     260198      53823 675.6MB/s  gaviota [ -0.5%]

Barcelona (Opteron):

  Benchmark     Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  --------------------------------------------
  BM_UFlat/0      112490     112457     100000 868.4MB/s  html    [ -0.4%]
  BM_UFlat/1     1066719    1066339      10000 627.9MB/s  urls    [ +1.0%]
  BM_UFlat/2       24679      24672     563802 4.8GB/s  jpg       [ +0.7%]
  BM_UFlat/3       50603      50589     277285 1.7GB/s  pdf       [ +2.6%]
  BM_UFlat/4      452982     452849      30900 862.6MB/s  html4   [ -0.2%]
  BM_UFlat/5       43860      43848     319554 535.1MB/s  cp      [ +1.2%]
  BM_UFlat/6       21419      21413     653573 496.6MB/s  c       [ +1.0%]
  BM_UFlat/7        6646       6645    2105405 534.1MB/s  lsp     [ +0.3%]
  BM_UFlat/8     1828487    1827886       7658 537.3MB/s  xls     [ +2.6%]
  BM_UFlat/9      391824     391714      35708 370.3MB/s  txt1    [ +2.2%]
  BM_UFlat/10     334913     334816      41885 356.6MB/s  txt2    [ +1.7%]
  BM_UFlat/11    1042062    1041674      10000 390.7MB/s  txt3    [ +1.1%]
  BM_UFlat/12    1398902    1398456      10000 328.6MB/s  txt4    [ +1.7%]
  BM_UFlat/13     545706     545530      25669 897.2MB/s  bin     [ -0.4%]
  BM_UFlat/14      71512      71505     196035 510.0MB/s  sum     [ +1.4%]
  BM_UFlat/15       8422       8421    1665036 478.7MB/s  man     [ +2.6%]
  BM_UFlat/16     112053     112048     100000 1009.3MB/s  pb     [ -0.4%]
  BM_UFlat/17     416723     416713      33612 421.8MB/s  gaviota [ -2.0%]

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r52 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-11-08 15:46:39 +0100 (Tue, 08 Nov 2011) | 5 lines

Fix public issue #53: Update the README to the API we actually open-sourced
with.

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r51 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-10-05 14:27:12 +0200 (Wed, 05 Oct 2011) | 5 lines

In the format description, use a clearer example to emphasize that varints are
stored in little-endian. Patch from Christian von Roques.

R=csilvers

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r50 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-09-15 21:34:06 +0200 (Thu, 15 Sep 2011) | 4 lines

Release Snappy 1.0.4.

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r49 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-09-15 11:50:05 +0200 (Thu, 15 Sep 2011) | 5 lines

Fix public issue #50: Include generic byteswap macros.
Also include Solaris 10 and FreeBSD versions.

R=csilvers

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r48 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-08-10 20:57:27 +0200 (Wed, 10 Aug 2011) | 5 lines

Partially fix public issue 50: Remove an extra comma from the end of some
enum declarations, as it seems the Sun compiler does not like it.

Based on patch by Travis Vitek.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r47 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-08-10 20:44:16 +0200 (Wed, 10 Aug 2011) | 4 lines

Use the right #ifdef test for sys/mman.h.

Based on patch by Travis Vitek.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r46 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-08-10 03:22:09 +0200 (Wed, 10 Aug 2011) | 6 lines

Fix public issue #47: Small comment cleanups in the unit test.

Originally based on a patch by Patrick Pelletier.

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r45 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-08-10 03:14:43 +0200 (Wed, 10 Aug 2011) | 8 lines

Fix public issue #46: Format description said "3-byte offset"
instead of "4-byte offset" for the longest copies.

Also fix an inconsistency in the heading for section 2.2.3.
Both patches by Patrick Pelletier.

R=csilvers

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r44 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-06-28 13:40:25 +0200 (Tue, 28 Jun 2011) | 8 lines

Fix public issue #44: Make the definition and declaration of CompressFragment
identical, even regarding cv-qualifiers.

This is required to work around a bug in the Solaris Studio C++ compiler
(it does not properly disregard cv-qualifiers when doing name mangling).

R=sanjay

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r43 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-06-04 12:19:05 +0200 (Sat, 04 Jun 2011) | 7 lines

Correct an inaccuracy in the Snappy format description.
(I stumbled into this when changing the way we decompress literals.)

R=csilvers

Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r42 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-06-03 22:53:06 +0200 (Fri, 03 Jun 2011) | 50 lines

Speed up decompression by removing a fast-path attempt.

Whenever we try to enter a copy fast-path, there is a certain cost in checking
that all the preconditions are in place, but it's normally offset by the fact
that we can usually take the cheaper path. However, in a certain path we've
already established that "avail < literal_length", which usually means that
either the available space is small, or the literal is big. Both will disqualify
us from taking the fast path, and thus we take the hit from the precondition
checking without gaining much from having a fast path. Thus, simply don't try
the fast path in this situation -- we're already on a slow path anyway
(one where we need to refill more data from the reader).

I'm a bit surprised at how much this gained; it could be that this path is
more common than I thought, or that the simpler structure somehow makes the
compiler happier. I haven't looked at the assembler, but it's a win across
the board on both Core 2, Core i7 and Opteron, at least for the cases we
typically care about. The gains seem to be the largest on Core i7, though.
Results from my Core i7 workstation:


  Benchmark            Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  ---------------------------------------------------
  BM_UFlat/0              73337      73091     190996 1.3GB/s  html      [ +1.7%]
  BM_UFlat/1             696379     693501      20173 965.5MB/s  urls    [ +2.7%]
  BM_UFlat/2               9765       9734    1472135 12.1GB/s  jpg      [ +0.7%]
  BM_UFlat/3              29720      29621     472973 3.0GB/s  pdf       [ +1.8%]
  BM_UFlat/4             294636     293834      47782 1.3GB/s  html4     [ +2.3%]
  BM_UFlat/5              28399      28320     494700 828.5MB/s  cp      [ +3.5%]
  BM_UFlat/6              12795      12760    1000000 833.3MB/s  c       [ +1.2%]
  BM_UFlat/7               3984       3973    3526448 893.2MB/s  lsp     [ +5.7%]
  BM_UFlat/8             991996     989322      14141 992.6MB/s  xls     [ +3.3%]
  BM_UFlat/9             228620     227835      61404 636.6MB/s  txt1    [ +4.0%]
  BM_UFlat/10            197114     196494      72165 607.5MB/s  txt2    [ +3.5%]
  BM_UFlat/11            605240     603437      23217 674.4MB/s  txt3    [ +3.7%]
  BM_UFlat/12            804157     802016      17456 573.0MB/s  txt4    [ +3.9%]
  BM_UFlat/13            347860     346998      40346 1.4GB/s  bin       [ +1.2%]
  BM_UFlat/14             44684      44559     315315 818.4MB/s  sum     [ +2.3%]
  BM_UFlat/15              5120       5106    2739726 789.4MB/s  man     [ +3.3%]
  BM_UFlat/16             76591      76355     183486 1.4GB/s  pb        [ +2.8%]
  BM_UFlat/17            238564     237828      58824 739.1MB/s  gaviota [ +1.6%]
  BM_UValidate/0          42194      42060     333333 2.3GB/s  html      [ -0.1%]
  BM_UValidate/1         433182     432005      32407 1.5GB/s  urls      [ -0.1%]
  BM_UValidate/2            197        196   71428571 603.3GB/s  jpg     [ +0.5%]
  BM_UValidate/3          14494      14462     972222 6.1GB/s  pdf       [ +0.5%]
  BM_UValidate/4         168444     167836      83832 2.3GB/s  html4     [ +0.1%]

R=jeff

Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r41 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-06-03 22:47:14 +0200 (Fri, 03 Jun 2011) | 43 lines

Speed up decompression by not needing a lookup table for literal items.

Looking up into and decoding the values from char_table has long shown up as a
hotspot in the decompressor. While it turns out that it's hard to make a more
efficient decoder for the copy ops, the literals are simple enough that we can
decode them without needing a table lookup. (This means that 1/4 of the table
is now unused, although that in itself doesn't buy us anything.)

The gains are small, but definitely present; some tests win as much as 10%,
but 1-4% is more typical. These results are from Core i7, in 64-bit mode;
Core 2 and Opteron show similar results. (I've run with more iterations
than unusual to make sure the smaller gains don't drown entirely in noise.)

  Benchmark            Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
  ---------------------------------------------------
  BM_UFlat/0              74665      74428     182055 1.3GB/s  html      [ +3.1%]
  BM_UFlat/1             714106     711997      19663 940.4MB/s  urls    [ +4.4%]
  BM_UFlat/2               9820       9789    1427115 12.1GB/s  jpg      [ -1.2%]
  BM_UFlat/3              30461      30380     465116 2.9GB/s  pdf       [ +0.8%]
  BM_UFlat/4             301445     300568      46512 1.3GB/s  html4     [ +2.2%]
  BM_UFlat/5              29338      29263     479452 801.8MB/s  cp      [ +1.6%]
  BM_UFlat/6              13004      12970    1000000 819.9MB/s  c       [ +2.1%]
  BM_UFlat/7               4180       4168    3349282 851.4MB/s  lsp     [ +1.3%]
  BM_UFlat/8            1026149    1024000      10000 959.0MB/s  xls     [+10.7%]
  BM_UFlat/9             237441     236830      59072 612.4MB/s  txt1    [ +0.3%]
  BM_UFlat/10            203966     203298      69307 587.2MB/s  txt2    [ +0.8%]
  BM_UFlat/11            627230     625000      22400 651.2MB/s  txt3    [ +0.7%]
  BM_UFlat/12            836188     833979      16787 551.0MB/s  txt4    [ +1.3%]
  BM_UFlat/13            351904     350750      39886 1.4GB/s  bin       [ +3.8%]
  BM_UFlat/14             45685      45562     308370 800.4MB/s  sum     [ +5.9%]
  BM_UFlat/15              5286       5270    2656546 764.9MB/s  man     [ +1.5%]
  BM_UFlat/16             78774      78544     178117 1.4GB/s  pb        [ +4.3%]
  BM_UFlat/17            242270     241345      58091 728.3MB/s  gaviota [ +1.2%]
  BM_UValidate/0          42149      42000     333333 2.3GB/s  html      [ -3.0%]
  BM_UValidate/1         432741     431303      32483 1.5GB/s  urls      [ +7.8%]
  BM_UValidate/2            198        197   71428571 600.7GB/s  jpg     [+16.8%]
  BM_UValidate/3          14560      14521     965517 6.1GB/s  pdf       [ -4.1%]
  BM_UValidate/4         169065     168671      83832 2.3GB/s  html4     [ -2.9%]

R=jeff

Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r40 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-06-03 00:57:41 +0200 (Fri, 03 Jun 2011) | 2 lines

Release Snappy 1.0.3.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r39 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-06-02 20:06:54 +0200 (Thu, 02 Jun 2011) | 11 lines

Remove an unneeded goto in the decompressor; it turns out that the
state of ip_ after decompression (or attempted decompresion) is
completely irrelevant, so we don't need the trailer.

Performance is, as expected, mostly flat -- there's a curious ~3-5%
loss in the "lsp" test, but that test case is so short it is hard to say
anything definitive about why (most likely, it's some sort of
unrelated effect).

R=jeff

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r38 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-06-02 19:59:40 +0200 (Thu, 02 Jun 2011) | 52 lines

Speed up decompression by caching ip_.

It is seemingly hard for the compiler to understand that ip_, the current input
pointer into the compressed data stream, can not alias on anything else, and
thus using it directly will incur memory traffic as it cannot be kept in a
register. The code already knew about this and cached it into a local
variable, but since Step() only decoded one tag, it had to move ip_ back into
place between every tag. This seems to have cost us a significant amount of
performance, so changing Step() into a function that decodes as much as it can
before it saves ip_ back and returns. (Note that Step() was already inlined,
so it is not the manual inlining that buys the performance here.)

The wins are about 3-6% for Core 2, 6-13% on Core i7 and 5-12% on Opteron
(for plain array-to-array decompression, in 64-bit opt mode).

There is a tiny difference in the behavior here; if an invalid literal is
encountered (ie., the writer refuses the Append() operation), ip_ will now
point to the byte past the tag byte, instead of where the literal was
originally thought to end. However, we don't use ip_ for anything after
DecompressAllTags() has returned, so this should not change external behavior
in any way.

Microbenchmark results for Core i7, 64-bit (Opteron results are similar):

Benchmark            Time(ns)    CPU(ns) Iterations
---------------------------------------------------
BM_UFlat/0              79134      79110       8835 1.2GB/s  html      [ +6.2%]
BM_UFlat/1             786126     786096        891 851.8MB/s  urls    [+10.0%]
BM_UFlat/2               9948       9948      69125 11.9GB/s  jpg      [ -1.3%]
BM_UFlat/3              31999      31998      21898 2.7GB/s  pdf       [ +6.5%]
BM_UFlat/4             318909     318829       2204 1.2GB/s  html4     [ +6.5%]
BM_UFlat/5              31384      31390      22363 747.5MB/s  cp      [ +9.2%]
BM_UFlat/6              14037      14034      49858 757.7MB/s  c       [+10.6%]
BM_UFlat/7               4612       4612     151395 769.5MB/s  lsp     [ +9.5%]
BM_UFlat/8            1203174    1203007        582 816.3MB/s  xls     [+19.3%]
BM_UFlat/9             253869     253955       2757 571.1MB/s  txt1    [+11.4%]
BM_UFlat/10            219292     219290       3194 544.4MB/s  txt2    [+12.1%]
BM_UFlat/11            672135     672131       1000 605.5MB/s  txt3    [+11.2%]
BM_UFlat/12            902512     902492        776 509.2MB/s  txt4    [+12.5%]
BM_UFlat/13            372110     371998       1881 1.3GB/s  bin       [ +5.8%]
BM_UFlat/14             50407      50407      10000 723.5MB/s  sum     [+13.5%]
BM_UFlat/15              5699       5701     100000 707.2MB/s  man     [+12.4%]
BM_UFlat/16             83448      83424       8383 1.3GB/s  pb        [ +5.7%]
BM_UFlat/17            256958     256963       2723 684.1MB/s  gaviota [ +7.9%]
BM_UValidate/0          42795      42796      16351 2.2GB/s  html      [+25.8%]
BM_UValidate/1         490672     490622       1427 1.3GB/s  urls      [+22.7%]
BM_UValidate/2            237        237    2950297 499.0GB/s  jpg     [+24.9%]
BM_UValidate/3          14610      14611      47901 6.0GB/s  pdf       [+26.8%]
BM_UValidate/4         171973     171990       4071 2.2GB/s  html4     [+25.7%]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
r37 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-05-17 10:48:25 +0200 (Tue, 17 May 2011) | 10 lines


Fix the numbering of the headlines in the Snappy format description.

R=csilvers
DELTA=4  (0 added, 0 deleted, 4 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1906

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r36 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-05-16 10:59:18 +0200 (Mon, 16 May 2011) | 12 lines


Fix public issue #32: Add compressed format documentation for Snappy.
This text is new, but an earlier version from Zeev Tarantov was used
as reference.

R=csilvers
DELTA=112  (111 added, 0 deleted, 1 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1867

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r35 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-05-09 23:29:02 +0200 (Mon, 09 May 2011) | 12 lines


Fix public issue #39: Pick out the median runs based on CPU time,
not real time. Also, use nth_element instead of sort, since we
only need one element.

R=csilvers
DELTA=5  (3 added, 0 deleted, 2 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1799

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r34 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-05-09 23:28:45 +0200 (Mon, 09 May 2011) | 19 lines


Fix public issue #38: Make the microbenchmark framework handle
properly cases where gettimeofday() can stand return the same
result twice (as sometimes on GNU/Hurd) or go backwards
(as when the user adjusts the clock). We avoid a division-by-zero,
and put a lower bound on the number of iterations -- the same
amount as we use to calibrate.

We should probably use CLOCK_MONOTONIC for platforms that support
it, to be robust against clock adjustments; we already use Windows'
monotonic timers. However, that's for a later changelist.

R=csilvers
DELTA=7  (5 added, 0 deleted, 2 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1798

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r33 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-05-04 01:22:52 +0200 (Wed, 04 May 2011) | 11 lines


Fix public issue #37: Only link snappy_unittest against -lz and other autodetected
libraries, not libsnappy.so (which doesn't need any such dependency).

R=csilvers
DELTA=20  (14 added, 0 deleted, 6 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1710

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r32 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-05-04 01:22:33 +0200 (Wed, 04 May 2011) | 11 lines


Release Snappy 1.0.2, to get the license change and various other fixes into
a release.

R=csilvers
DELTA=239  (236 added, 0 deleted, 3 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1709

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r31 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-04-26 14:34:55 +0200 (Tue, 26 Apr 2011) | 15 lines


Fix public issue #30: Stop using gettimeofday() altogether on Win32,
as MSVC doesn't include it. Replace with QueryPerformanceCounter(),
which is monotonic and probably reasonably high-resolution.
(Some machines have traditionally had bugs in QPC, but they should
be relatively rare these days, and there's really no much better
alternative that I know of.)

R=csilvers
DELTA=74  (55 added, 19 deleted, 0 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1556

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r30 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-04-26 14:34:37 +0200 (Tue, 26 Apr 2011) | 11 lines


Fix public issue #31: Don't reset PATH in autogen.sh; instead, do the trickery
we need for our own build system internally.

R=csilvers
DELTA=16  (13 added, 1 deleted, 2 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1555

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-04-16 00:55:56 +0200 (Sat, 16 Apr 2011) | 12 lines


When including <windows.h>, define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN first,
so we won't pull in macro definitions of things like min() and max(),
which can conflict with <algorithm>.

R=csilvers
DELTA=1  (1 added, 0 deleted, 0 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1485

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r28 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-04-11 11:07:01 +0200 (Mon, 11 Apr 2011) | 15 lines


Fix public issue #29: Write CPU timing code for Windows, based on GetProcessTimes()
instead of getursage().

I thought I'd already committed this patch, so that the 1.0.1 release already
would have a Windows-compatible snappy_unittest, but I'd seemingly deleted it
instead, so this is a reconstruction.

R=csilvers
DELTA=43  (39 added, 3 deleted, 1 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1295

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r27 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-04-08 11:51:53 +0200 (Fri, 08 Apr 2011) | 22 lines


Include C bindings of Snappy, contributed by Martin Gieseking.

I've made a few changes since Martin's version; mostly style nits, but also
a semantic change -- most functions that return bool in the C++ version now
return an enum, to better match typical C (and zlib) semantics.

I've kept the copyright notice, since Martin is obviously the author here;
he has signed the contributor license agreement, though, so this should not
hinder Google's use in the future.

We'll need to update the libtool version number to match the added interface,
but as of http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updating-version-info.html
I'm going to wait until public release.

R=csilvers
DELTA=238  (233 added, 0 deleted, 5 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1294

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r26 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-04-07 18:36:43 +0200 (Thu, 07 Apr 2011) | 13 lines


Replace geo.protodata with a newer version.

The data compresses/decompresses slightly faster than the old data, and has
similar density.

R=lookingbill
DELTA=1  (0 added, 0 deleted, 1 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1288

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r25 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-03-30 22:27:53 +0200 (Wed, 30 Mar 2011) | 12 lines


Fix public issue #27: Add HAVE_CONFIG_H tests around the config.h
inclusion in snappy-stubs-internal.h, which eases compiling outside the
automake/autoconf framework.

R=csilvers
DELTA=5  (4 added, 1 deleted, 0 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1152

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r24 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-03-30 22:27:39 +0200 (Wed, 30 Mar 2011) | 13 lines


Fix public issue #26: Take memory allocation and reallocation entirely out of the
Measure() loop. This gives all algorithms a small speed boost, except Snappy which
already didn't do reallocation (so the measurements were slightly biased in its
favor).

R=csilvers
DELTA=92  (69 added, 9 deleted, 14 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1151

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r23 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-03-30 22:25:09 +0200 (Wed, 30 Mar 2011) | 18 lines


Renamed "namespace zippy" to "namespace snappy" to reduce
the differences from the opensource code.  Will make it easier
in the future to mix-and-match third-party code that uses
snappy with google code.

Currently, csearch shows that the only external user of
"namespace zippy" is some bigtable code that accesses
a TEST variable, which is temporarily kept in the zippy
namespace.

R=sesse
DELTA=123  (18 added, 3 deleted, 102 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1150

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r22 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-03-29 00:17:04 +0200 (Tue, 29 Mar 2011) | 11 lines


Put back the final few lines of what was truncated during the
license header change.

R=csilvers
DELTA=5  (4 added, 0 deleted, 1 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1094

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r21 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-03-26 03:34:34 +0100 (Sat, 26 Mar 2011) | 20 lines


Change on 2011-03-25 19:18:00-07:00 by sesse

	Replace the Apache 2.0 license header by the BSD-type license header;
	somehow a lot of the files were missed in the last round.

	R=dannyb,csilvers
	DELTA=147  (74 added, 2 deleted, 71 changed)

Change on 2011-03-25 19:25:07-07:00 by sesse

	Unbreak the build; the relicensing removed a bit too much (only comments
	were intended, but I also accidentially removed some of the top lines of
	the actual source).



Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1072

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r20 | snappy.mirrorbot@gmail.com | 2011-03-25 17:14:41 +0100 (Fri, 25 Mar 2011) | 10 lines


Change Snappy from the Apache 2.0 to a BSD-type license.

R=dannyb
DELTA=328  (80 added, 184 deleted, 64 changed)


Revision created by MOE tool push_codebase.
MOE_MIGRATION=1061
Updated devel/snappy to 1.0.5
Add a buildlink3.mk