labofsahil/github-event-dataset-2012 huggingface dataset:
What is "Cord Native BlackBerry SDK"?

Why Not "BlackBerry Native SDK" ?

Is this intentional or a type?
Yeah thats a good point. We would also need to describe each of the commands in the list a little more than just the small little description that is printed with them. That can be done later though. This was just to get someone setup with the environment.
Oops, rewrote this sentence in a hurry. Wow, I don't commonly make syntax errors in comments ;)
The only corrections made for SOQL are typographical, and for SOSL only the search term is escaped. Is the latter acceptable? How about removing the former?
Left in heir language (just "feel good" language at this point) and removed the right to sublicense in favor of new article 5
>The problem is that, if the path exists, and is a file, you'll return foo/bar/baz (baz is a file) as foo/bar/baz/ without further checks, which is wrong and will fail subsequent lookups.

yes, hence my comment, but with !mustExists - I think that's up to the user.
They've asked for a 'formatted' abs path, and that's what they get back.

Anyway, there's no guarantee after return of makeAbsolutePath and before use that the path will still be valid by the time it is used.
Both cases are relative paths. Asserting on the first might be more radical than on the second, yet, I think it's warranted.
Mention the different formats this variable can take.
This method is actually a callback from the Javascript runtime that a property has been changed, modifying an existing property is not necessarily the expected behavior here.
why don't we just rename the variables rather than have the comment explaining their names?
> This is going to have lasting effects on the state of the running process.

True.

>  If order was randomized, and these tests run before the "without" tests,
you are going to have failures.  That sort of order dependency is not good.

Not true.

The way I'm mocking prevents these ordering issues because I'm explicitly
intercepting the call to Module.const_defined? in the without tests.
Therefore, it doesn't matter if the other test defined Puppet or didn't.

With this information, do you think it's still an issue that I'm doing
module Puppet; end in one of the test groups?
Added a mobile css file with the jquery work around.
I believe the initializer here: test/dummy/config/initializers/wrap_parameters.rb does what you want,specifically, alter this chunk:

```
# Disable root element in JSON by default.
ActiveSupport.on_load(:active_record) do
  self.include_root_in_json = false # we would change this to true
end
```

I tested this change by commenting out these 2 methods (here and the other model), setting the above to true, and rerunning the tests.  Assuming we have test coverage that exercises this, it appears to work as expected - no additional test failures.
Clicking the same one should actually close it too, for consistency with Network.
0 ^ (-1) ===  -1

'for(var i = 0, crc = -1; i < length; i++) {'
The way this is coded, only the first signature key location will be tested (local settings).
You need to test the AppData location as well and ensure it also gets the home drive prepended.
but.. you're creating the SPI file in the test case? And you''re mocking the one responsible for loading the file. Maybe i'm missing what you're testing here?
CS `} else {` cs.sensiolabs.org
Signals. See dmclain/texastribune#3. `toggle_item` is probably superior.
-Incorrect indentation for this block
-This file does not comply to the code convention
no; virtual isn't even a keyword