[HttpFoundation] Complete Request::overrideGlobals
Add a set of unit tests for the ExprBuilder class
Method rename and phpdoc fixes
merged branch jeanmonod/config-unittest-on-exprbuilder (PR #4570)

Commits
-------

9d730be Method rename and phpdoc fixes
e01a95e Add a set of unit tests for the ExprBuilder class

Discussion
----------

Add a set of unit tests for the Config/ExprBuilder class

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by travisbot at 2012-06-13T14:55:31Z

This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1611400) (merged e01a95e1 into c07e9163).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by jeanmonod at 2012-06-13T22:04:52Z

Hi there,

I write all these tests because I'll come latter with an other PR that extend the ExprBuilder functionality. But I'm not sure I use the best way for testing this class. It's working, but some refactoring suggestions will be welcome...
@stof and @schmittjoh what do you think about that?
merged branch stealth35/populate_files (PR #2892)

Commits
-------

b217897 [HttpFoundation] Complete Request::overrideGlobals

Discussion
----------

[2.2][HttpFoundation] complete Request::overrideGlobals

Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: [![Build Status](https://secure.travis-ci.org/stealth35/symfony.png?branch=populate_files)](http://travis-ci.org/stealth35/symfony)Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2011-12-15T14:20:36Z

Thank guys, should be better now

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2011-12-15T16:14:40Z

@stloyd :v:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stloyd at 2011-12-15T16:22:48Z

@stealth35 You should update also [`RequestTest`](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/HttpFoundation/RequestTest.php#L623) which would show you typos you have few mins ago ;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2011-12-15T16:57:16Z

@stloyd done, thanks for your review

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by canni at 2011-12-15T20:27:28Z

As this is bugfix, this shouldn't be re-based against 2.0?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2011-12-15T20:50:05Z

@canni It's more a forget feature, I tagged it to bug fix because of the `FIXME`, and it's add a method, IMO there is no rush

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by canni at 2011-12-15T20:55:28Z

@stealth35 no rush at all, I was just curious :)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-01-06T16:24:31Z

I would say "Backwards compatibility break: yes" i.e.tests have been modified.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-01-06T16:36:15Z

@vicb the tests are not modified, just some addition

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-01-06T16:40:30Z

@stealth35 https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2892/files#L2R46

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-01-06T17:13:07Z

@vicb it's not a compatibility break ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-01-06T17:19:35Z

Well, same inputs, different outputs, this is a compatibility break to me.
But however it is named we should not change the behavior of this class; Client values are values as passed by the client you should no try to guess them.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-01-06T17:32:41Z

@vicb the behavior ? when you change the GET or POST values with `HttpFoundation\*Bag` (replace/set) it's the same thing

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-01-06T17:35:39Z

I am referring to the difference in behavior between the current implementation and the version in this PR.
They do not behave the same and that's why the tests have been modified.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by fabpot at 2012-02-14T23:33:42Z

any progress on this PR?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-02-15T07:48:34Z

To make it clear I strongly disagree with the modifs in this PR. Available to help if needed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-02-15T09:24:50Z

@fabpot Well, `move_uploaded_file` will not work so I have some doubt about this, @vicb just don't like the fact to add the mime type type and the size, it's not an important thing, I can remove it we can discuss later about that,

@vicb the last thing to do, it's to recreate the weird php $_FILES array

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-02-23T17:11:29Z

@stealth35 I don't think we can bypass the `move_uploaded_file` security check - which is good. Is there any interest in this PR w/o this ?

If no we should just update phpDoc comment and remove the FIXME (meaning we can not override the `$_FILES`).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-03-10T16:13:14Z

@vicb updated

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-03-11T09:38:20Z

@stealth35 what about adding some unit tests ?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-03-11T11:06:44Z

> what about adding some unit tests ?

@vicb `request_order` is PHP_INI_PERDIR, so I don't really how to handle this

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-03-11T11:15:55Z

by creating a `protected getRequestOrder()` method or something like this ?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-03-11T11:36:11Z

it's too bad to create a method just for this, I can make cond in the test

``` php
<?php
$request->initialize(array('get' => 'foo'), array('post' => 'bar'));
$request->overrideGlobals();

$request_order = ini_get('request_order');

if ('gp' === $request_order) {
    $this->assertEquals(array('get' => 'foo', 'post' => 'bar'), $_REQUEST);
} else if ('pg' === $request_order) {
    $this->assertEquals(array('post' => 'bar', 'get' => 'foo'), $_REQUEST);
}
// ...
```

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-03-11T12:02:17Z

This would only test one case.

Some thoughts about your snippet:

* The init should probably be `$request->initialize(array('foo' => 'get'), array('foo' => 'post'));`,
* `$request_order` does not take into account `variables_order.ini`,
* missing `strtolower`

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by fabpot at 2012-03-23T21:21:59Z

What's the status of this PR? What needs to be done before merging?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-03-24T18:33:42Z

@fabpot missing some tests, it's not essay to tests an `ini`directive, @vicb recommand a `getRequestOrder` method, it's not a bad idea

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2012-03-24T20:06:53Z

and change `$request_order` to `$requestOrder` as suggested by @henrikbjorn I can't find where

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by stealth35 at 2012-06-14T12:42:25Z

I need help for testing

``` php
<?php
$request = $this->getMock('Request', array('overrideGlobals', 'initialize'));

$request->expects($this->any())
        ->method('getRequestOrder')
        ->will($this->returnValue('gp'));

$request->initialize(array('foo' => 'fooget'), array('foo' => 'foopost'));
$request->overrideGlobals();

$this->assertEquals(array_merge($_GET, $_POST), $_REQUEST);
```
fixed CS
added Request::getSchemeAndHttpHost() and Request::getUserInfo() (closes #4312, refs #3416, refs #3056)
Reverted to Symfony 2.0's signature, which made it simple to display only a subset of the routes of the application.
This is particularly useful for FOSJsRoutingBundle's fos:js-routing:debug command, which allows to filter the list of javascript-exposed routes.
merged branch xavierlacot/master (PR #4680)

Commits
-------

e44e21c Reverted to Symfony 2.0's signature, which made it simple to display only a subset of the routes of the application. This is particularly useful for FOSJsRoutingBundle's fos:js-routing:debug command, which allows to filter the list of javascript-exposed routes.

Discussion
----------

Allow to pass a routes list to RouterDebugCommand::outputRoutes()

I just reverted to Symfony 2.0's signature, which made it simple to display only a subset of the routes of the application. This is particularly useful for FOSJsRoutingBundle's fos:js-routing:debug command, which allows to filter the list of javascript-exposed routes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by travisbot at 2012-06-28T16:41:31Z

This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1730923) (merged e44e21c2 into 884a8264).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by willdurand at 2012-06-28T16:47:07Z

:+1:
merged branch fabpot/request-methods (PR #4679)

Commits
-------

df8d94e added Request::getSchemeAndHttpHost() and Request::getUserInfo() (closes #4312, refs #3416, refs #3056)

Discussion
----------

added Request::getSchemeAndHttpHost() and Request::getUserInfo()

see #4312

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by travisbot at 2012-06-28T15:22:03Z

This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1730172) (merged 598bd56f into 0d275701).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by Seldaek at 2012-06-28T15:22:35Z

Why not just `getSchemeAndHost`? That sounds long enough, and is fairly explicit given the context.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by fabpot at 2012-06-28T15:25:34Z

@Seldaek because (and that's probably unfortunate) we have both `getHost()` and `getHttpHost()`. The former does not include the port whereas the latter does.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by Seldaek at 2012-06-28T15:26:42Z

Ok makes sense.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by travisbot at 2012-06-28T16:11:16Z

This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1730630) (merged df8d94e3 into 884a8264).
fixed typo
fixed sub-requests with a different method than the main request
[HttpKernel] added some unit tests