libceph: always allow trail in osd request

An osd request structure contains an optional trail portion, which
if present will contain data to be passed in the payload portion of
the message containing the request.  The trail field is a
ceph_pagelist pointer, and if null it indicates there is no trail.

A ceph_pagelist structure contains a length field, and it can
legitimately hold value 0.  Make use of this to change the
interpretation of the "trail" of an osd request so that every osd
request has trailing data, it just might have length 0.

This means we change the r_trail field in a ceph_osd_request
structure from a pointer to a structure that is always initialized.

Note that in ceph_osdc_start_request(), the trail pointer (or now
address of that structure) is assigned to a ceph message's trail
field.  Here's why that's still OK (looking at net/ceph/messenger.c):
    - What would have resulted in a null pointer previously will now
      refer to a 0-length page list.  That message trail pointer
      is used in two functions, write_partial_msg_pages() and
      out_msg_pos_next().
    - In write_partial_msg_pages(), a null page list pointer is
      handled the same as a message with 0-length trail, and both
      result in a "in_trail" variable set to false.  The trail
      pointer is only used if in_trail is true.
    - The only other place the message trail pointer is used is
      out_msg_pos_next().  That function is only called by
      write_partial_msg_pages() and only touches the trail pointer
      if the in_trail value it is passed is true.
Therefore a null ceph_msg->trail pointer is equivalent to a non-null
pointer referring to a 0-length page list structure.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
rbd: kill op_needs_trail()

Since every osd message is now prepared to include trailing data,
there's no need to check ahead of time whether any operations will
make use of the trail portion of the message.

We can drop the second argument ot get_num_ops(), and as a result we
can also get rid of op_needs_trail() which is no longer used.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
libceph: pass length to ceph_osdc_build_request()

The len argument to ceph_osdc_build_request() is set up to be
passed by address, but that function never updates its value
so there's no need to do this.  Tighten up the interface by
passing the length directly.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
libceph: pass length to ceph_calc_file_object_mapping()

ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() takes (among other things) a "file"
offset and length, and based on the layout, determines the object
number ("bno") backing the affected portion of the file's data and
the offset into that object where the desired range begins.  It also
computes the size that should be used for the request--either the
amount requested or something less if that would exceed the end of
the object.

This patch changes the input length parameter in this function so it
is used only for input.  That is, the argument will be passed by
value rather than by address, so the value provided won't get
updated by the function.

The value would only get updated if the length would surpass the
current object, and in that case the value it got updated to would
be exactly that returned in *oxlen.

Only one of the two callers is affected by this change.  Update
ceph_calc_raw_layout() so it records any updated value.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
libceph: drop snapid in ceph_calc_raw_layout()

A snapshot id must be provided to ceph_calc_raw_layout() even though
it is not needed at all for calculating the layout.

Where the snapshot id *is* needed is when building the request
message for an osd operation.

Drop the snapid parameter from ceph_calc_raw_layout() and pass
that value instead in ceph_osdc_build_request().

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
libceph: drop osdc from ceph_calc_raw_layout()

The osdc parameter to ceph_calc_raw_layout() is not used, so get rid
of it.  Consequently, the corresponding parameter in calc_layout()
becomes unused, so get rid of that as well.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
libceph: don't set flags in ceph_osdc_alloc_request()

The only thing ceph_osdc_alloc_request() really does with the
flags value it is passed is assign it to the newly-created
osd request structure.  Do that in the caller instead.

Both callers subsequently call ceph_osdc_build_request(), so have
that function (instead of ceph_osdc_alloc_request()) issue a warning
if a request comes through with neither the read nor write flags set.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
libceph: don't set pages or bio in ceph_osdc_alloc_request()

Only one of the two callers of ceph_osdc_alloc_request() provides
page or bio data for its payload.  And essentially all that function
was doing with those arguments was assigning them to fields in the
osd request structure.

Simplify ceph_osdc_alloc_request() by having the caller take care of
making those assignments

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
rbd: pass num_op with ops array

Add a num_op parameter to rbd_do_request() and rbd_req_sync_op() to
indicate the number of entries in the array.  The callers of these
functions always know how many entries are in the array, so just
pass that information down.

This is in anticipation of eliminating the extra zero-filled entry
in these ops arrays.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
libceph: pass num_op with ops

Both ceph_osdc_alloc_request() and ceph_osdc_build_request() are
provided an array of ceph osd request operations.  Rather than just
passing the number of operations in the array, the caller is
required append an additional zeroed operation structure to signal
the end of the array.

All callers know the number of operations at the time these
functions are called, so drop the silly zero entry and supply that
number directly.  As a result, get_num_ops() is no longer needed.
This also means that ceph_osdc_alloc_request() never uses its ops
argument, so that can be dropped.

Also rbd_create_rw_ops() no longer needs to add one to reserve room
for the additional op.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
rbd: there is really only one op

Throughout the rbd code there are spots where it appears we can
handle an osd request containing more than one osd request op.

But that is only the way it appears.  In fact, currently only one
operation at a time can be supported, and supporting more than
one will require much more than fleshing out the support that's
there now.

This patch changes names to make it perfectly clear that anywhere
we're dealing with a block of ops, we're in fact dealing with
exactly one of them.  We'll be able to simplify some things as
a result.

When multiple op support is implemented, we can update things again
accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>