mm: fix up some user-visible effects of the stack guard page

commit d7824370e26325c881b665350ce64fb0a4fde24a upstream.

This commit makes the stack guard page somewhat less visible to user
space. It does this by:

 - not showing the guard page in /proc/<pid>/maps

   It looks like lvm-tools will actually read /proc/self/maps to figure
   out where all its mappings are, and effectively do a specialized
   "mlockall()" in user space.  By not showing the guard page as part of
   the mapping (by just adding PAGE_SIZE to the start for grows-up
   pages), lvm-tools ends up not being aware of it.

 - by also teaching the _real_ mlock() functionality not to try to lock
   the guard page.

   That would just expand the mapping down to create a new guard page,
   so there really is no point in trying to lock it in place.

It would perhaps be nice to show the guard page specially in
/proc/<pid>/maps (or at least mark grow-down segments some way), but
let's not open ourselves up to more breakage by user space from programs
that depends on the exact deails of the 'maps' file.

Special thanks to Henrique de Moraes Holschuh for diving into lvm-tools
source code to see what was going on with the whole new warning.

Reported-and-tested-by: François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be
Reported-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Linux 2.6.32.20
mm: fix page table unmap for stack guard page properly

commit 11ac552477e32835cb6970bf0a70c210807f5673 upstream.

We do in fact need to unmap the page table _before_ doing the whole
stack guard page logic, because if it is needed (mainly 32-bit x86 with
PAE and CONFIG_HIGHPTE, but other architectures may use it too) then it
will do a kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic.

And those kmaps will create an atomic region that we cannot do
allocations in.  However, the whole stack expand code will need to do
anon_vma_prepare() and vma_lock_anon_vma() and they cannot do that in an
atomic region.

Now, a better model might actually be to do the anon_vma_prepare() when
_creating_ a VM_GROWSDOWN segment, and not have to worry about any of
this at page fault time.  But in the meantime, this is the
straightforward fix for the issue.

See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16588 for details.

Reported-by: Wylda <wylda@volny.cz>
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org>
Reported-by: François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Tested-by: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
ata_piix: fix locking around SIDPR access

commit 213373cf974fe69e78ec894b07f45ae2f5a3a078 upstream.

SIDPR window registers are shared across ports and as each access is
done in two steps, accesses to different ports under EH may race.
This primarily is caused by incorrect host locking in EH context and
should be fixed by defining locking requirements for each EH operation
which can be used during EH and enforcing them but for now work around
the problem by adding a dedicated SIDPR lock and grabbing it for each
SIDPR access.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Paul Check <paul@thechecks.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
sched: cgroup: Implement different treatment for idle shares

commit cd8ad40de36c2fe75f3b731bd70198b385895246 upstream.

When setting the weight for a per-cpu task-group, we have to put in a
phantom weight when there is no work on that cpu, otherwise we'll not
service that cpu when new work gets placed there until we again update
the per-cpu weights.

We used to add these phantom weights to the total, so that the idle
per-cpu shares don't get inflated, this however causes the non-idle
parts to get deflated, causing unexpected weight distibutions.

Reverse this, so that the non-idle shares are correct but the idle
shares are inflated.

Reported-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1257934048.23203.76.camel@twins>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>