labofsahil/github-event-dataset-2012 huggingface dataset:
Yeah I'm phasing out multiple "{" and "-"
`!this.isHand`
chunk(1) is the commit interval, so at this point you have decided that the resulting Step will be chunk oriented, and hence need to provide the type parameters.  I'm not sure this is relevant to the current pull request though (it's really a refinement of BATCH-1913).
maybe this should be renamed `default_params_for(resource)`
Код надо вынести в отдельный класс-метод.
assert mk_api.is_manifest_valid
eveloper_submissions.py:131:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
@ahojnnes I will need help here... 

the user needs e.g. the function definition in 'rank.py' (in 8bit)

    def modal(image, selem, out=None, mask=None, shift_x=False, shift_y=False):
    ....

to apply the filter directly inside rank.py we need to access to both cdef functions `_core8` located in `_core8.pxd` and 'kernel_modal' located inside `_crank8.pyx` and doing something like

    return _core8(kernel_modal, ...)

to do that I create intermediate python wrappers in `_crank8.py`, that should not be, indeed, used somewhere else.

The question is : how can I do that without the wrappers ?
Is the comment still relevant?
Actually here two things should be done
1. transform y_pred using ``labels``. That is each element in ``y_pred`` finds its index in ``labels``
2. Those element not in labels should be eliminated(get the mask).
So I think of these code to do so :)
I am not sure the theoretical results still hold for a density larger than 1/3. The 1/3 density comes from the original paper by D. Achlioptas. 2003. "[Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins.](http://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~optas/papers/jl.pdf)".

The fact that we can instead use `1 /  sqrt(n_features)` to make the RP matrix sparser so has to use less memory and compute the projection faster while still mostly getting the same embedding quality is the improvement by Ping Li.

I don't know what happens when the RP matrix gets denser. But in practice if one chooses the Sparse RP instead of the Gaussian RP it's to get as sparse a RP matrix as possible to reduce the CPU and memory usage.
Same remark: this is probably a few lines of numpy.
Makes only sense if the list is sorted at some time? I don't think that's needed for coordinate descent.
for these, it might be easier to read:

`if x is not None`
> if pos_label == None and n_labels == 2, it does not break but the case is considered a binary classification case whereas it should be considered a multiclass classification case because pos_label == None (cf. documentation of sklearn.metrics.precision_recall_fscore_support)

maybe you could add a test that breaks with current master and now works.
in test_metrics.py
elsewhere -> otherwise
@jakevdp Thanks for that. If I have taken your point, it is better for me to use ```utils.arpack``` currently for it to run with scipy <0.10. So maybe @magsol would also need just a small modification here? :)
Omg how did I let this slip :smile:
All good now, design-wise.
My bad concerning l.104.

Thanks for the contribution and the CS fixes !
isnt activesupport at 3.2.7?  or an I off?
should also add `auto r_gs2 = S7019(1);` if not present elsewhere
Should be `Expression *`
This should be re-named from "tibbtest" because this project was created for testing purposes only. We should re-name it to "tibbapp".
please use camel case for vars.  so this one should be renamed qnxHost
I'm curious, where did you find this way of extracting the year month and day?  I can't even see that from the v8 docs.

It seems like quite a bit of work, but looks to be doing the right thing.
Readbility is debatable. Personally, I would use it like that, but it's mainly a coding style. The first `sprintf` had to go, because I nearly had a stroke with a security issue (see other comment); the rest just went away in the wake of that one.
I don't think this can be globally assumed. Does Daemons error if group is not given?
Why do you need Version.LUCENE_35 specifically? could you add a comment about it?
If you meant the test defaults, we have test constants to take the standard analyzer of the tested version.
Generally we never use assert() - always using assertex.

However, I do agree.  I think we should have a dbgassertex macro - I added one to the heap manager, but I think it should be moved into jexcept.   If that was done then yes I would agree.

I'll issue a separate pull request for that change,. and see if Richard agrees.
Should also become a more general function.  getInternalTypeText()
If the row is created from a volatile transform (from a random number), we need not transform, or it'll create a new random number on every row of the resulting dataset. So, ```isPure``` is valid for both types of rows.
Gratuitous.
Gotta find a way to not print out the cloning bit.
In reality library.io has no dependencies. This is just to show off.
That said, this might be a good place for defaultdict, I think it could be done more concisely.
That's a really good point. The discourage of use. 

I'll `rm` this file then.
@stevegury: OK, I'll need some elaboration on this. :) Adding my own sbt script would a) do what in particular and b) obviate the need for which plugins? Does this seem to you to be the right thing to do?

I'm trying to do a balance between "do this right" and "not want to spend 3 weeks writing shell scripts".
**x** properties or a dict with **x** keys doesn't change the fact that this **x** is, imho, too big and means, imho, that in some points limpyd is becoming overspecific/overoptimized and lack some architectural refactoring. Just to be clear: this **x** is here from the beginning, he, so I'm not pointing you ;) Just saying that the more I see it growing, the more I see its, say, lack of grace ;)
Part of the reasoning behind putting this here is that I don't only want to assert the type of new instances, but I may want to write an assertion class that verifies parameters of existing resources as well.
For example, if my module allows one of its resources to be shared via the instanceManager, it may be possible for other modules to tamper with it (for whatever reason). By writing an assertion, I can be sure that the resource will be exactly the one I expect before I have a chance to use it (and potentially cause trouble).
Why not re-use the list above that you added ("apache_modules_defined"), rather than have more StringTemplate replacement here, for a variable we already have the values of? This seems counter productive to me - we should have as much CFEngine-pure code as possible.
This is making `test.aria.core.JSONP` fail, because `xhrObject.conn` is undefined on failures and `_fillInresponseObject` doesn't handle that
I'd then change this to something like:

    options = {}
    paginate = self.get_table_pagination()
    if paginate is not None:
        options['paginate'] = paginate
    RequestConfig(self.request, **options).configure(table)

This would allow what ever default `RequestConfig` has to be honored.
this uses the admin portal to login. this will work for prod and beta. do you have a way of testing this on the other env : qa, head or release?
remove this isElementPresent. use the one you move to utilities.
add try catch whenever performing some action on the page. This is a new thing that we'd like to do to make logging easier when we implement it.
Should use randomString() here instead.
I was under the impression we were using ems to specify font sizes. Are we mixing ems and pxs?
@shacker this looks like a lot of copy pasting, is there a way to abstract this?
Tässä pääsisit eroon `and`:stä ja `not`:sta kääntämällä testausjärjestyksen toisin päin.
I removed the var cartFormValidator, I think we dont need this. do we?
Why is port not used here?
As previous comment, will remove.
Anything to do with this comment? can be deleted?
strange spacing on this one
This is *really* minor: I would be inclined to move `rho` just under `x0, y0`. And right before definitions of `radius` and `theta` add the comment from the example:

    # Ensure that swirl decays to 1/1000^{theta} within the specified radius.
My rationale was that 

1. having a map function and separate map_kwargs that you would pass-through was confusing and un-necessary because the caller can just do `lambda x: inverse_map(x, **map_kwargs)`, and that's all warp is providing anyway.

2. If I called my argument inverse_map, then the caller will see that it's like warp and expect to be able to pass the kwargs just the same

So I (perhaps arrogantly) thought I was doing your project a favor by providing a way forward to get out of (1) eventually, which I saw as a mistake.

That said... it's really not a big deal. If you'd rather rename that parameter and add the map_kwargs please go ahead and do it. But I feel like I've jumped through enough hoops. Like I said in another post, I wanted to have this finished off before my vacation which has technically already started.
you can test the returned dtype here in this function
Sorry for being dense, I think I asked the same question in the original PR: Why isn't `_coeffs` defined as `range(9)` (or `range(6) + [8]` in `AffineTransform`) instead of here and below.
What date is required?
Although I'm sure `[...]` is my notation, perhaps `[/* ... */]` is better since this is a code snippet.
This was pre-existing, so let's break it when we need to rather than now.
No way, if I start ignoring other comments then I can't boss people around when it's my turn to be the reviewer :)
I agree. Maybe in the future. As of now, looking at other JS GUI libraries to replace the twitter button functionality seems to be a low priority thing. Right now they work as expected.
In the NonValidatingSSLSocketFactory class, we have some custom logic for connect.  Do we need to apply any of that to TiSocketFactory?
I'll use the jQuery trim method http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.trim/ because it does exactly the same thing as the regex there. Naming it strip_trailing_spaces makes me think that the function will remove only spaces at the end of the string which is not the case here.
Fixed, along with some errors (use of `var`, wrong class used in `super`, ...).
This is missing the case of `string` vs `Range!dchar` case, as well as the `Range!dchar` vs `string` case.

While still keeping your implementation, and with a bit of restriction magic, then this should do it, I think:

```D
auto commonPrefix(alias pred, R1, R2)(R1 r1, R2 r2)
    if (isForwardRange!R1 && is(Unqual!(ElementEncodingType!R1) == dchar) && //Range of dchar that is NOT a narrow string
        && isNarrowString!R2 &&
        is(typeof(binaryFun!pred(r1.front, r2.front)) : bool))
{
    commonPrefix(r2, r1); //Swap and forward to the other implementation
}

auto commonPrefix(alias pred, R1, R2)(R1 r1, R2 r2)
    if (isNarrowString!R1 &&
        isForwardRange!R2 && is(Unqual!(ElementType!R2) == dchar) && //Range of dchar that MAY be a narrow string
        is(typeof(binaryFun!pred(r1.front, r2.front)) : bool))
{
    //Same implementation as before...
    //This works because r1 is decoded, whereas r2 is popped/
}
```
My quick test reveals that ensure block still runs even if process receives SIGINT or SIGTERM.
should this be the cinder user, rather than root?
Renamed to `ValidatableParameters` and `ValidatableReturnValue`.

> However, i am still missing symmetry here.

`BeanMetaData` implements `Validatable` since a bean itself is a validated object (it has constraints, cascadable elements etc.). `ExecutableMetaData` doesn't implement `Validatable` since a method/constructor isn't validated, it is it's parameters or return value which are validated. Thus `ExecutableMetaData` provides access to `ValidatableParameters` and `ValidatableReturnValue`.

Besides `Validatable` and `Cascadable` I see another facet interface which we might need, `Describable` (better name pending). This facet would return the elements name and element descriptor and could be used to create the property path for a violated constraint.

So I'm thinking about having a stack of `Describable` to which elements are added as we traverse through the graph (bean, property or method/parameter etc.). In the end we would just iterate through the stacked describables and collect the element descriptors and names to create a path. In that approach `BeanMetaData` would implement the facets `Validatable` and `Describable`, that's why I think its name should be `BeanMetadata`.

I think it could look like this in the end:

* `BeanMetaData`: implements `Validatable` and `Describable`, provides access to `ExecutableMetaData`
* `ExecutableMetaData`: implements `Describable`, provides access to `ValidatableParameters` and `ValidatableReturnValue`
* `PropertyMetaData`: implements `Describable` and `Cascadable`
* `ParameterMetaData`: implements `Describable` and `Cascadable`
* `ValidatableParameters`: implements `Validatable` and `Describable`
* `ValidatableReturnValue`: implements `Validatable` and `Describable`

Validation would always begin at a validatable (either for a bean or an executable's arguments/return value) and then follow the cascadable elements.

At least that's my current line of thinking, I guess it needs more fine-tuning and adjustment. Does that make sense?
Remove the commented lines.
Have you tested this against other vcsrepo providers (git, etc.?)
The binding code is needed for the build



On Feb 20, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Nathan Landis
<reply@reply.github.com>
wrote:

>> *.o
>> -
>> -src
>> -node_modules
>
> why ship the src dir to npm?
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/my8bird/node-leveldb/pull/19/files#r469545
What is the purpose of this class? Is it different from the other report controllers?
Can we refactor to not using toString? Much clearer calling render directly.
Resources are not supported yet (they're sitting in a private branch waiting for their turn). However, these strings are not localizable and therefore they should not be stored in resources.
Er, you're probably right.  I'll remove it.
this dependency can probably be removed since we can now use composer autoloader
I am pretty sure that there are no such things as **kwargs in the puppet DSL. Maybe if we wrote it in the Ruby version of the puppet DSL.
This should be using `Time.zone.parse()`
so in this line you add the original request url including the format, in case there is an explicit route.
then the next line changes url to become the url without the format. took me a while to understand this but seems right.
The only possible downside is if the managed object context used to fetch the notes is not the same as the sharedAppDelegate's managedObectContext, but in this app we only ever use the one context so it's the way to go.
I also agree with the tabs argument. However, every single convention i have ever seen for many different languages and many different projects enforce spaces instead of tabs. Why should we be any different? Also, not using spaces would break compatibility with Zend, Symfony and PEAR.
Better readability, but seems a bit overkill.
Is there a callback you can attach this to so we're not relying on the performance of the browser to ensure that everything takes place sub 1000ms?
I only catch es_419 because that's what the bug notes. We could take the general heuristic of us lang_LANG for any bad locale but I didn't have a failure case for that and was worried doing such would create problems by fixing problems.
Simply use ``$input = tempnam(sys_get_temp_dir(), 'input');``
This is tested in the above test, doesn't need to be asserted here too. It may seem like more assertions is better, but it reduces test granularity. If name assignment and tags stop working, the fact that you added this assertion will mask the fact that tags don't work either on the initial test run, requiring a second run to discover that fact.
This probably introduces a security vulnerability - if we're just taking the exact text from a field and inserting it into the DOM.
You're right; this was a feeble attempt at a quick fix to the perf issue I was seeing before I dug deeper and found the timeout issue above.
@glarizza  Was any of this commented code important?
Style bike-she: I like to move python standard library imports to the top.
My understanding is that the __block keyword breaks the reference cycle.
NIT: Please, in english ;p
I'd argue that we should not necessarily promote putting anything in here that would be written to at runtime.
I don't remember this needing to be nil? -- I would use blank?
Anywhere we call `Parse` and the data is invalid will cause a blow up.  We need to encapsulate things like this into helper functions that throw a sensible error.  It doesn't have to part of this change, but I wanted to mention it (I'll write up an issue).
What do you think about creating a `testTheme(theme)` function that each test would call. It looks as though the code is the exact same in each test, minus the theme name.
I removed the anonymous function from here just because!  (wrapping things in anonymous functions is bad if you dont need to, adds overhead and changes scope/context)
Why are you importing both `fields` and its content directly? You know that I don't like importing things directly? Please import only modules.
This isn't right, we don't want to close the `<tr>` before the following column, which contains the links.
no tienen que ser públicos, no tiene sentido porque me cago en el encapsulamiento. Lo que tenés que hacer es dejarlos private y cuando los querés usar para reflection, usar setAccessible()
I'm afraid I dont know enough about this, but eyeballing our databases the values look okay.  I presume you havent noticed any issues with your databases either since updates 20-23 (written by vertres) also reordered the enum?
I prefer the previous style here, but whatever.
don't need this comment
use Json::FastWriter().write instead, it's cheaper than constructing an object for a one time use
Good catch, fixed in latest
maybe it would make sense to verify that the plugin is used in preference to the string in the event that there's a name collision?
bug with Uppercase
Yah, well since it is fully tested in the other cookbook, we are simply testing our particular use case, but not the other library directly.
I think a should_receive would actually be a better test.  I'll let you check that out.

Previously, we actually had this call stubbed out, but I was able to get it to work.  Now, I run into problems, and can't run tests, all b/c
the openstack-utils cookbook is included.  Can't seem to figure out why.
Do we really need this attribute? would it be possible to have the same functionality without this attribute?
It should either be `wcf.acp.menu.link.language` or `wcf.acp.menu.link.language.list` (currently in other edit form classes, both, the general item wrapper and the list item are used).
although my understanding is that these are stop-gaps, please be sure to zero the list after calling all the functions, since you may otherwise keep things alive that would otherwise be GC'ed if you got rid of the references.
i think its a bit overzealous .. especially it complains about stuff like:

```
// foo
return $foo
```
Maintainable JavaScript http://www.amazon.com/Maintainable-JavaScript-Nicholas-C-Zakas/dp/1449327680
But then the second step should be "connect some host to it"?
Вообще, зачем нужна `$up($add(html))`?
Actually it's Michelle who wrote this part. I am thinking she did this because it has to be passed to the different thread? If it's not allocated from the heap, doesn't it go out of scope when the function returns?
Can we rename this to `test-app`. We already have `jake native-test` and `jake upload-ssh-key` and we should maintain the same convention.
Let's change it back then please.  In case we accidentally do evil later on.
Can we use different naming for the file like menuService.js ?
delete the system architecture class
In fact I forgot about some code, sorry. Could you look again? What do you mean "more standard"?
I believe the combination of ordinary javascript (Spine.Controller) with LiveScript requires you to explicitly call "super" to invoke inheritance and copy super methods and attributes to the class.

I am not sure if this is still the case, since the inheritance changed a lot in LiveScript 1.0
A corriger "qu'elle était perdue".