Bluetooth: unlock if allocation fails in hci_blacklist_add()

There was a small typo here so we never actually hit the goto which
would call hci_dev_unlock_bh().

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
(cherry picked from commit 8475e2336cf80ba6e7b27715b4b3214d73c211ab)
Bluetooth: btusb: be quiet on device disconnect

Disabling the bluetooth usb device embedded in (some) ThinkPads tends to
lead to errors like these:
    btusb_bulk_complete: hci0 urb ffff88011b9bfd68 failed to resubmit (19)
    btusb_intr_complete: hci0 urb ffff88011b46a318 failed to resubmit (19)
    btusb_bulk_complete: hci0 urb ffff88011b46a000 failed to resubmit (19)

That is because usb_disconnect() doesn't "quiesces" pending urbs.

Disconnecting a device is a normal thing to happen so it's no big deal
that usb_submit_urb() returns -ENODEV. The simplest way to get rid of
these errors is to stop treating that return as an error. Trivial,
actually.

While we're at it, add comments to be explicit about the reasons we're
not complaining about -EPERM and -ENODEV.

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
(cherry picked from commit 4935f1c164ac528dff3538f97953b385ba500710)
Bluetooth: cmtp: Fix lost wakeup of session thread

Fix race condition which can result in missing the wakeup intended
to stop the session thread.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
(cherry picked from commit 3a3f5c7df55a1294c9e6e2d0b8cea604b137438f)
Bluetooth: cmtp: Fix deadlock in session deletion

Commit fada4ac339 introduced the usage of kthread API.
kthread_stop is a blocking function which returns only when
the thread exits. In this case, the thread can't exit because it's
waiting for the write lock, which is being held by cmtp_del_connection()
which is waiting for the thread to exit -- deadlock.

Revert cmtp_reset_ctr to its original behavior: non-blocking signalling
for the session to terminate.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
(cherry picked from commit 7176522cdca1f0b78a1434b41761f0334511822a)
Bluetooth: cmtp: Fix session cleanup on failed conn add

Once the session thread is running, cleanup must be handled
by the session thread only.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
(cherry picked from commit 687beaa0d1d937c327e2f97b4b4fa6c23ca70624)
capabilities: do not grant full privs for setuid w/ file caps + no effective caps

A task (when !SECURE_NOROOT) which executes a setuid-root binary will
obtain root privileges while executing that binary.  If the binary also
has effective capabilities set, then only those capabilities will be
granted.  The rationale is that the same binary can carry both setuid-root
and the minimal file capability set, so that on a filesystem not
supporting file caps the binary can still be executed with privilege,
while on a filesystem supporting file caps it will run with minimal
privilege.

This special case currently does NOT happen if there are file capabilities
but no effective capabilities.  Since capability-aware programs can very
well start with empty pE but populated pP and move those caps to pE when
needed.  In other words, if the file has file capabilities but NOT
effective capabilities, then we should do the same thing as if there
were file capabilities, and not grant full root privileges.

This patchset does that.

(Changelog by Serge Hallyn).

Signed-off-by: Zhi Li <lizhi1215@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4d49f6710bfbd2271feab074f8c1053387e5d9fe)
ARM: fix perf build with uclibc toolchains

libio.h is not provided by uClibc, in order to be able to test the
definition of __UCLIBC__ we need to include stdlib.h, which also
includes stddef.h, providing the definition of 'NULL'.

Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0ac8e58f3818795d02ac309bd57b4d93ec283a77)
sched: Remove noop in next_prio()

When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
function could be removed, since only RT tasks are returned by the
function.

Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimxmWiof9s5AvS3v_0X+sMiE=0x5g@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 67d955383ab2ef8866c494c14156a4f3d29e441c)
sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task()

Do not call dequeue_pushable_task() when failing to push an eligible
task, as it remains pushable, merely not at this particular moment.

Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1306895385.4791.26.camel@marge.simson.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 311e800e16f63d909136a64ed17ca353a160be59)
sched: Remove resetting exec_start in put_prev_task_rt()

There's no reason to clean the exec_start in put_prev_task_rt() as it is reset
when the task gets back to the run queue. This saves us doing a store() in the
fast path.

Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimqWD=q6YnSDi-v9y=LMWecgEzEWg@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 1812a643ccbfeb61a00a7f0d7219606e63d8815b)
sched: Balance RT tasks when forked as well

When a new task is woken, the code to balance the RT task is currently
skipped in the select_task_rq() call. But it will be pushed if the rq
is currently overloaded with RT tasks anyway. The issue is that we
already queued the task, and if it does get pushed, it will have to
be dequeued and requeued on the new run queue. The advantage with
pushing it first is that we avoid this requeuing as we are pushing it
off before the task is ever queued.

See commit 318e0893ce3f524 ("sched: pre-route RT tasks on wakeup")
for more details.

The return of select_task_rq() when it is not a wake up has also been
changed to return task_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id(). This is more
of a sanity because the current only other user of select_task_rq()
besides wake ups, is an exec, where task_cpu() should also be the same
as smp_processor_id(). But if it is used for other purposes, lets keep
the task on the same CPU. Why would we mant to migrate it to the current
CPU?

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110617015919.832743148@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit c37495fd0f64fc139b5a07d242bcb485174d1206)
sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio

Hillf Danton proposed a patch (see link) that cleaned up the
sched_rt code that calculates the priority of the next highest priority
task to be used in finding run queues to pull from.

His patch removed the calculating of the next prio to just use the current
prio when deteriming if we should examine a run queue to pull from. The problem
with his patch was that it caused more false checks. Because we check a run
queue for pushable tasks if the current priority of that run queue is higher
in priority than the task about to run on our run queue. But after grabbing
the locks and doing the real check, we find that there may not be a task
that has a higher prio task to pull. Thus the locks were taken with nothing to
do.

I added some trace_printks() to record when and how many times the run queue
locks were taken to check for pullable tasks, compared to how many times we
pulled a task.

With the current method, it was:

  3806 locks taken vs 2812 pulled tasks

With Hillf's patch:

  6728 locks taken vs 2804 pulled tasks

The number of times locks were taken to pull a task went up almost double with
no more success rate.

But his patch did get me thinking. When we look at the priority of the highest
task to consider taking the locks to do a pull, a failure to pull can be one
of the following: (in order of most likely)

 o RT task was pushed off already between the check and taking the lock
 o Waiting RT task can not be migrated
 o RT task's CPU affinity does not include the target run queue's CPU
 o RT task's priority changed between the check and taking the lock

And with Hillf's patch, the thing that caused most of the failures, is
the RT task to pull was not at the right priority to pull (not greater than
the current RT task priority on the target run queue).

Most of the above cases we can't help. But the current method does not check
if the next highest prio RT task can be migrated or not, and if it can not,
we still grab the locks to do the test (we don't find out about this fact until
after we have the locks). I thought about this case, and realized that the
pushable task plist that is maintained only holds RT tasks that can migrate.
If we move the calculating of the next highest prio task from the inc/dec_rt_task()
functions into the queuing of the pushable tasks, then we only measure the
priorities of those tasks that we push, and we get this basically for free.

Not only does this patch make the code a little more efficient, it cleans it
up and makes it a little simpler.

Thanks to Hillf Danton for inspiring me on this patch.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimQ67180HxCx5vgMqumqw1EkFh3qg@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 5181f4a46afd99e5e85c639b189e43e0a42b53df)
sched/cpupri: Remove the vec->lock

sched/cpupri: Remove the vec->lock

The cpupri vec->lock has been showing up as a top contention
lately. This is because of the RT push/pull logic takes an
agressive approach for migrating RT tasks. The cpupri logic is
in place to improve the performance of the push/pull when dealing
with large number CPU machines.

The problem though is a vec->lock is required, where a vec is a
global per RT priority structure. That is, if there are lots of
RT tasks at the same priority, every time they are added or removed
from the RT queue, this global vec->lock is taken. Now that more
kernel threads are becoming RT (RCU boost and threaded interrupts)
this is becoming much more of an issue.

There are two variables that are being synced by the vec->lock.
The cpupri bitmask, and the vec->counter. The cpupri bitmask
is one bit per priority. If a RT priority vec has a process queued,
then the vec->count is > 0 and the cpupri bitmask is set for that
RT priority.

If the cpupri bitmask gets out of sync with the vec->counter, we could
end up pushing a low proirity RT task to a high priority queue.
That RT task that could have run immediately could be queued on a
run queue with a higher priority task indefinitely.

The solution is not to use the cpupri bitmask and just look at the
vec->count directly when doing a pull. The cpupri bitmask is just
a fast way to scan the RT priorities when a pull is made. Instead
of using the bitmask, and just examine all RT priorities, and
look at the vec->counts, we could eliminate the vec->lock. The
scan of RT tasks is to find a run queue that we can push an RT task
to, and we do not push to a high priority queue, thus the scan only
needs to go from 1 to RT task->prio, and not all 100 RT priorities.

The push algorithm, which does the scan of RT priorities (and
scan of the bitmask) only happens when we have an overloaded RT run
queue (more than one RT task queued). The grabbing of the vec->lock
happens every time any RT task is queued or dequeued on the run
queue for that priority. The slowing down of the scan by not using
a bitmask is negligible by the speed up of removing the vec->lock
contention, and replacing it with an atomic counter and memory barrier.

To prove this, I wrote a patch that times both the loop and the code
that grabs the vec->locks. I passed the patches to various people
(and companies) to test and show the results. I let everyone choose
their own load to test, giving different loads on the system,
for various different setups.

Here's some of the results: (snipping to a few CPUs to not make
this change log huge, but the results were consistent across
the entire system).

System 1 (24 CPUs)

Before patch:
CPU:    Name    Count   Max     Min     Average Total
----    ----    -----   ---     ---     ------- -----
[...]
cpu 20: loop    3057    1.766   0.061   0.642   1963.170
        vec     6782949 90.469  0.089   0.414   2811760.503
cpu 21: loop    2617    1.723   0.062   0.641   1679.074
        vec     6782810 90.499  0.089   0.291   1978499.900
cpu 22: loop    2212    1.863   0.063   0.699   1547.160
        vec     6767244 85.685  0.089   0.435   2949676.898
cpu 23: loop    2320    2.013   0.062   0.594   1380.265
        vec     6781694 87.923  0.088   0.431   2928538.224

After patch:
cpu 20: loop    2078    1.579   0.061   0.533   1108.006
        vec     6164555 5.704   0.060   0.143   885185.809
cpu 21: loop    2268    1.712   0.065   0.575   1305.248
        vec     6153376 5.558   0.060   0.187   1154960.469
cpu 22: loop    1542    1.639   0.095   0.533   823.249
        vec     6156510 5.720   0.060   0.190   1172727.232
cpu 23: loop    1650    1.733   0.068   0.545   900.781
        vec     6170784 5.533   0.060   0.167   1034287.953

All times are in microseconds. The 'loop' is the amount of time spent
doing the loop across the priorities (before patch uses bitmask).
the 'vec' is the amount of time in the code that requires grabbing
the vec->lock. The second patch just does not have the vec lock, but
encompasses the same code.

Amazingly the loop code even went down on average. The vec code went
from .5 down to .18, that's more than half the time spent!

Note, more than one test was run, but they all had the same results.

System 2 (64 CPUs)

Before patch:
CPU:    Name    Count   Max     Min     Average Total
----    ----    -----   ---     ---     ------- -----
cpu 60: loop    0       0       0       0       0
        vec     5410840 277.954 0.084   0.782   4232895.727
cpu 61: loop    0       0       0       0       0
        vec     4915648 188.399 0.084   0.570   2803220.301
cpu 62: loop    0       0       0       0       0
        vec     5356076 276.417 0.085   0.786   4214544.548
cpu 63: loop    0       0       0       0       0
        vec     4891837 170.531 0.085   0.799   3910948.833

After patch:
cpu 60: loop    0       0       0       0       0
        vec     5365118 5.080   0.021   0.063   340490.267
cpu 61: loop    0       0       0       0       0
        vec     4898590 1.757   0.019   0.071   347903.615
cpu 62: loop    0       0       0       0       0
        vec     5737130 3.067   0.021   0.119   687108.734
cpu 63: loop    0       0       0       0       0
        vec     4903228 1.822   0.021   0.071   348506.477

The test run during the measurement did not have any (very few,
from other CPUs) RT tasks pushing. But this shows that it helped
out tremendously with the contention, as the contention happens
because the vec->lock is taken only on queuing at an RT priority,
and different CPUs that queue tasks at the same priority will
have contention.

I tested on my own 4 CPU machine with the following results:

Before patch:
CPU:    Name    Count   Max     Min     Average Total
----    ----    -----   ---     ---     ------- -----
cpu 0:  loop    2377    1.489   0.158   0.588   1398.395
        vec     4484    770.146 2.301   4.396   19711.755
cpu 1:  loop    2169    1.962   0.160   0.576   1250.110
        vec     4425    152.769 2.297   4.030   17834.228
cpu 2:  loop    2324    1.749   0.155   0.559   1299.799
        vec     4368    779.632 2.325   4.665   20379.268
cpu 3:  loop    2325    1.629   0.157   0.561   1306.113
        vec     4650    408.782 2.394   4.348   20222.577

After patch:
CPU:    Name    Count   Max     Min     Average Total
----    ----    -----   ---     ---     ------- -----
cpu 0:  loop    2121    1.616   0.113   0.636   1349.189
        vec     4303    1.151   0.225   0.421   1811.966
cpu 1:  loop    2130    1.638   0.178   0.644   1372.927
        vec     4627    1.379   0.235   0.428   1983.648
cpu 2:  loop    2056    1.464   0.165   0.637   1310.141
        vec     4471    1.311   0.217   0.433   1937.927
cpu 3:  loop    2154    1.481   0.162   0.601   1295.083
        vec     4236    1.253   0.230   0.425   1803.008

This was running my migrate.c code that can be found at:
http://lwn.net/Articles/425763/

The migrate code does stress the RT tasks a bit. This shows that
the loop did increase a little after the patch, but not by much.
The vec code dropped dramatically. From 4.3us down to .42us.
That's a 10x improvement!

Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>
Tested-by: Luis Claudio R. Gonçalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Hank Sabins<msabins@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1312317372.18583.101.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit c92211d9b772792a9dea530c042efb4ab5562f50)
sched/cpupri: Fix memory barriers for vec updates to always be in order

[ This patch actually compiles. Thanks to Mike Galbraith for pointing
that out. I compiled and booted this patch with no issues. ]

Re-examining the cpupri patch, I see there's a possible race because the
update of the two priorities vec->counts are not protected by a memory
barrier.

When a RT runqueue is overloaded and wants to push an RT task to another
runqueue, it scans the RT priority vectors in a loop from lowest
priority to highest.

When we queue or dequeue an RT task that changes a runqueue's highest
priority task, we update the vectors to show that a runqueue is rated at
a different priority. To do this, we first set the new priority mask,
and increment the vec->count, and then set the old priority mask by
decrementing the vec->count.

If we are lowering the runqueue's RT priority rating, it will trigger a
RT pull, and we do not care if we miss pushing to this runqueue or not.

But if we raise the priority, but the priority is still lower than an RT
task that is looking to be pushed, we must make sure that this runqueue
is still seen by the push algorithm (the loop).

Because the loop reads from lowest to highest, and the new priority is
set before the old one is cleared, we will either see the new or old
priority set and the vector will be checked.

But! Since there's no memory barrier between the updates of the two, the
old count may be decremented first before the new count is incremented.
This means the loop may see the old count of zero and skip it, and also
the new count of zero before it was updated. A possible runqueue that
the RT task could move to could be missed.

A conditional memory barrier is placed between the vec->count updates
and is only called when both updates are done.

The smp_wmb() has also been changed to smp_mb__before_atomic_inc/dec(),
as they are not needed by archs that already synchronize
atomic_inc/dec().

The smp_rmb() has been moved to be called at every iteration of the loop
so that the race between seeing the two updates is visible by each
iteration of the loop, as an arch is free to optimize the reading of
memory of the counters in the loop.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1312547269.18583.194.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit d473750b4073f16f23f46f30dc1bd3de45c35754)
sched/cpupri: Remove cpupri->pri_active

Since [sched/cpupri: Remove the vec->lock], member pri_active
of struct cpupri is not needed any more, just remove it. Also
clean stuff related to it.

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110806001004.GA2207@zhy
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 5710f15b52664ae0bfa60a66d75464769d297b2b)
sched: Allow for positional tg_tree walks

Extend walk_tg_tree to accept a positional argument

static int walk_tg_tree_from(struct task_group *from,
			     tg_visitor down, tg_visitor up, void *data)

Existing semantics are preserved, caller must hold rcu_lock() or sufficient
analogue.

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110721184757.677889157@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 8277434ef1202ce30315f8edb3fc760aa6e74493)
sched: Migrate throttled tasks on HOTPLUG

Throttled tasks are invisisble to cpu-offline since they are not eligible for
selection by pick_next_task().  The regular 'escape' path for a thread that is
blocked at offline is via ttwu->select_task_rq, however this will not handle a
throttled group since there are no individual thread wakeups on an unthrottle.

Resolve this by unthrottling offline cpus so that threads can be migrated.

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110721184757.989000590@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 8cb120d3e41a0464a559d639d519cef563717a4e)
sched: Add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics

This change introduces statistics exports for the cpu sub-system, these are
added through the use of a stat file similar to that exported by other
subsystems.

The following exports are included:

nr_periods:	number of periods in which execution occurred
nr_throttled:	the number of periods above in which execution was throttle
throttled_time:	cumulative wall-time that any cpus have been throttled for
this group

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110721184758.198901931@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit e8da1b18b32064c43881bceef0f051c2110c9ab9)

Conflicts:
	kernel/sched.c
	kernel/sched_fair.c
sched: Return unused runtime on group dequeue

When a local cfs_rq blocks we return the majority of its remaining quota to the
global bandwidth pool for use by other runqueues.

We do this only when the quota is current and there is more than
min_cfs_rq_quota [1ms by default] of runtime remaining on the rq.

In the case where there are throttled runqueues and we have sufficient
bandwidth to meter out a slice, a second timer is kicked off to handle this
delivery, unthrottling where appropriate.

Using a 'worst case' antagonist which executes on each cpu
for 1ms before moving onto the next on a fairly large machine:

no quota generations:

 197.47 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 199.46 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 205.46 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 198.46 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 208.39 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage

Since we are allowed to use "stale" quota our usage is effectively bounded by
the rate of input into the global pool and performance is relatively stable.

with quota generations [1s increments]:

 119.58 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 119.65 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 119.64 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 119.63 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 119.60 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage

The large deficit here is due to quota generations (/intentionally/) preventing
us from now using previously stranded slack quota.  The cost is that this quota
becomes unavailable.

with quota generations and quota return:

 200.09 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 200.09 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 198.09 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 200.09 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage
 200.06 ms       /cgroup/a/cpuacct.usage

By returning unused quota we're able to both stably consume our desired quota
and prevent unintentional overages due to the abuse of slack quota from
previous quota periods (especially on a large machine).

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110721184758.306848658@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit d8b4986d3dbc4fabc2054d63f1d31d6ed2fb1ca8)
sched: Add documentation for bandwidth control

Basic description of usage and effect for CFS Bandwidth Control.

Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110721184758.498036116@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 88ebc08ea9f721d1345d5414288a308ea42ac458)