labofsahil/github-event-dataset-2012 huggingface dataset:
metricList, metricName. There will be more JS functions to query the metric collection.

On 11. 09. 12, at 11:30, Mitar <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In tests/test_project/test_app/static/test_app/datastream.js:
> 
> > +            plot.getPlaceholder().unbind("plotselected", onPlotSelected);
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        plot.hooks.bindEvents.push(bindEvents);
> > +        plot.hooks.processOptions.push(processOptions);
> > +        plot.hooks.shutdown.push(shutdown);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    $.plot.plugins.push({
> > +        init: init,
> > +        options: options,
> > +        name: "datastream",
> > +        version: "0.1"
> > +    });
> > +
> > +    window.datastream = datastream;
> So which are those function and why would not we want them in the plugin?
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
> 
>
to contain *the* documents
Ah right I had forgotten about this - I needed to edit the file in eclipse (since I can barely remember Java idiosyncrasies) and that was what eclipse needed to use it since setOptions wasn't a method available to the classifier object
@bp323 I used the title of the website here, but I changed it back.
wrapper[0] unwraps the jq object, but why? The jquery way to get the id of an elemnt is id_ = wrapper.attr('id').
pull out updating view principal ids into a shared method
Done.  I changed all places where multiple level inline function nesting was being used.  Let me know if the change looks better.  Also, let me know if you'd like me to remove all inline function nesting altogether.
Is this line realy usefull ?
May I counter that we're in databases.py
Will need tweaking as above.
I'll reactivate it. I think I removed it before I learned about the matrix thing.
@sam-falvo The error message might be a bit misleading here. It is after the case on line 160 because I want to ensure that there is at least one object to copy attributes from into the target object *after* the whitelist arg(if any) is removed from the list of arguments.
Around here is where I actually changed things in this file.
Just to be sure: was the commenting out of the highlight a temporary test? Looks like it...
What happens for this combinations? Are they getting just ignored, is a warning logged or even an exception thrown? An additional note might be good here.
quitá los comentarios... en el modelo logico no hay tipo "fecha". problema del programa feo ese que usamos.
Thanks. Please file a new issue if it's in our code.
@jeffheifetz I think it's a JSON, but I found then the argument of requestClosure API should be defined as JSON, too. Thanks for pointing it out.
mxss<mxss>mxss
тогда его не надо пересчитывать,
Change t to position (Position)
Missing JavaDoc
The page's header does not reflect the page's content.
Please, get used to new variable `$sn`.
As for this one: initially there were supports() method in the TransactionProvider that would help to distinguish the supported transaction, but since it has been removed there is no return information from the provider which annotation to pass, tho we could pass all the annotations in a collection.

For me splitting the annotation one for defining the behaviour (@Transactional) and seperate for configuration (in that case @SpringTransactionConfiguration) is somehow more readable, this is a bit similar to the Spring itself. Maybe @bartoszmajsak would like say what he things.
Sure, but then you need to define for each and every test case. Lemme think which one I like more ;) I guess current one is a bit too fuzzy.