labofsahil/github-event-dataset-2012 huggingface dataset:
Removed the queryProvider. The generic JDBC message store we have does not scale very well for the purpose of backing a channel using JDBC. E.g. if multiple threads try to poll from the database, you run quickly into locking issues. Therefore, in order to improve the situation, we decided to provide a channel-specific MessageStore implementation using:

* Just one single Table (instead of 3)
* Provide Database-specific queries
I don't know if it's compliant or not; I was just asking if we are sure that setStringProperty is allowed for setJMSCorrelationID in the spec?
Refactored the code with commit 7b16025
sequenceAware = this.releaseStrategy instanceof SequenceSizeReleaseStrategy

Problem is if sequenceAware in constructor and then they pass something else in here.
Are we sure that all message groups will be FIFO?

If someone ever implements a LIFO group (or some other order) this won't work; we're relying on the first N messages being those that existed when we started up.
Should also allow setting <i>expect-single-result</> attribute, currently this is ignored and even if set will allow multiple results to be retruned
This probably shouldn't be edit.html as there's no editing in here. Feels more like show.html. Adjust ProfilesController#edit accordingly (and depending on whether you used Resource, also routing).
Este não é um projeto web

deveria ser:

objectos :: comuns :: boleto
2012/5/10 Dan Bode
<reply@reply.github.com>:
>> @@ -74,12 +74,8 @@
>>      }
>>    } else {
>>      $enable_network_service = false
>> -    if ! $network_host {
> are you sure this isnt required? do you know exactly what this flag is used for?

This is a complete list of places in Nova where this flag is used:


...so yes, I'm quite sure we don't need to pass it. (Hint: The list is empty)
sup and sub are removed in this line
Change this to TRUE if you'd rather the default behavior is to insert the delete action.
@christianv The link no longer says "Register Here", but "Sign Up"
@apex13 Re-worded it
Era un motiv pentru care fiecare modul făcea `import database`: dacă crapă import-ul, trebuie să pice testul, nu să crape nose când face tests discovery. Pe de altă parte este enervant să imporți modulul de 20 de ori. Deci lasă-l așa for now.
不好意思，又发现一个小问题。此空行不是真的空，而是一串空格
Works well! Pretty good actually.
There is some refactoring work necessary to move it out, I think this is best done as a separate step of creating an SDK for mobile.
<tip>Be careful when using tips</tip> ;)
Can you move this JS code also to the bottom?
To create the singleton, wouldn't it be safer (as in thread-safer ;-) to use dispatch_once
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5720029/create-singleton-using-gcds-dispatch-once-in-objective-c
Why did you strip Routine from the tag declaration? Also, I'm not sure if EOF is valid to declare an IC tag. I may be wrong, but I thought the string literals were specific. EOD is for documentation. EOR is for Routine. Etc.
Fixed in PR #15
I vastly prefer this
This repeat section shouldn't be here.
Here and below is just formatting... I don't know why.
Add a comment that this is shared with the entire stack
*blink*

I'm pretty sure that should be a WritableDatabase…
Это место возможно лучше заменить на
```JS
$q('input[type="submit"]', dForm).onclick = function(e) {
	$pd(e);
	showMainReply();
	$alert(Lng.deleting[lang], 'deleting', true);
	ajaxSubmit(new dataForm(dForm, this), checkDelete);
};
```
Имхо, AJAX сообщение о нарушении ненужно.
So can we remove performExec now?